设施番茄连作障碍土壤修复及其对青枯病害的防治效果

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2018.01.014

中国生物防治学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 117-123.DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2018.01.014

设施番茄连作障碍土壤修复及其对青枯病害的防治效果

郑雪芳¹, 刘波¹, 朱育菁¹, 陈德局¹, 陈小强¹, 魏余煌²

1. 福建省农业科学院农业生物资源研究所, 福州 350003;
2. 浙江省瑞安市农业局, 瑞安 325200

收稿日期:2017-09-07 出版日期:2018-02-08 发布日期:2018-02-06
通讯作者: 刘波,博士,研究员,E-mail:fzliubo@163.com
作者简介:郑雪芳,博士,副研究员,E-mail:zhengxuefangfz@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目（2017YFD201100）；国家自然科学基金（31701835）；福建省农业科学院科技创新团队（STTT2017-1-11）；福建省农业科学院青年英才基金（YC2016-15）

Soil Restoration for Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Tomato Greenhouse Field and the Control Effect against Bacterial Wilt Disease

ZHENG Xuefang¹, LIU Bo¹, ZHU Yujing¹, CHEN Deju¹, CHEN Xiaoqiang¹, WEI Yuhuang²

1. Agricultural Bio-Resources Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China;
2. Rui'an Bureau of Agriculture Zhejiang Province, Rui'an 325200, China

Received:2017-09-07 Online:2018-02-08 Published:2018-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 连作障碍的土壤修复是世界性难题。本研究利用土壤微生态修复剂结合青枯病植物疫苗菌剂来改良土壤和预防青枯病发生。在连作7年的番茄地，设3种处理，处理1为添加量60 t/hm²的土壤微生态修复剂和植物疫苗100倍稀释液，处理2为添加量30 t/hm²的土壤微生态修复剂和植物疫苗100倍稀释液，CK为不添加土壤微生态修复剂和植物疫苗，研究不同处理对连作番茄土壤养分、土壤酶活性、植株生长特性及病害防效的影响。结果表明，土壤微生态修复剂2种不同添加量处理的番茄土壤有机质、全氮、全磷和交换性钙含量均显著高于对照，而全钾含量显著低于对照；两种不同添加量处理的番茄土壤过氧化氢酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶和酸性磷酸酶活性均显著高于对照，添加量为30 t/hm²处理的土壤各酶活性（酸性磷酸酶除外）大于添加量为60 t/hm²处理的土壤；添加30 t/hm²处理的单果重量（113.82 g）显著高于添加量60 t/hm²处理（104.07 g）和对照处理（104.99 g）（P<0.05），其对番茄青枯病防效达91.87%，大于添加量为60 t/hm²处理的防效（55.34%）。

关键词: 连作障碍, 土壤修复, 番茄青枯病, 综合治理技术

Abstract: Soil restoration for continuous cropping obstacles has become a serious problem in the world. In this study, micro ecological preparation and plant vaccine agent (avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum) were combined to restore soil and prevent bacterial wilt disease. At 7 years continuous cropping tomato greenhouses field, two doses of micro ecological preparation (60 t/hm² and 30 t/hm²) combining with plant vaccine agent were designed, and the control did not contain any micro ecological preparation or plant vaccine. The effects of different treatments on the contents of soil nutrients, soil enzymes, biological characteristics of tomato plant and the control efficiency against bacterial wilt disease were compared. The results showed that the contents of organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphatase and exchangeable calcium for two doses of micro ecological preparation treatments were significantly higher than control treatment, while the content of total potassium was significantly lower. Moreover, the activities of soil urease, catalase, sucrose and acid phosphatase for two doses of micro ecological preparation treatments were also significantly higher than control treatment, and they were higher for the dose of 30 t/hm² than for the dose of 60 t/hm². The single fruit weight at the dose of 30 t/hm² was 113.82 g, significantly higher than that of 60 t/hm² dose (104.07 g) and control treatment (104.99 g) (P<0.05). Furthermore, the control efficiency of 30 t/hm² micro ecological preparation (reaching to 91.87%) was also higher than that of 60 t/hm².

Key words: continuous cropping obstacles, soil restoration, tomato bacterial wilt disease, comprehensive control measures

中图分类号:

S476

郑雪芳, 刘波, 朱育菁, 陈德局, 陈小强, 魏余煌. 设施番茄连作障碍土壤修复及其对青枯病害的防治效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(1): 117-123.

ZHENG Xuefang, LIU Bo, ZHU Yujing, CHEN Deju, CHEN Xiaoqiang, WEI Yuhuang. Soil Restoration for Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Tomato Greenhouse Field and the Control Effect against Bacterial Wilt Disease[J]. journal1, 2018, 34(1): 117-123.

参考文献

[1] 葛晓颖, 孙志刚, 李涛, 等. 设施番茄连作障碍与土壤芽孢杆菌和假单胞菌及微生物群落的关系分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(2):514-523.
[2] Yadessa G B, Bruggen A, Ocho F L. Effects of different soil amendments on bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum and on the yield of tomato[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2010, 92:439-450.
[3] 王敬国, 陈清, 林杉. 设施菜田退化土壤修复与资源高效利用[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2011.
[4] Tan Y, Cui Y, Li H, et al. Rhizospheric soil and root endogenous fungal diversity and composition in response to continuous panax notoginseng cropping practices[J]. Microbiology Research, 2017, 194:10-19.
[5] Xiong W, Zhao Q Y, Zhao J. Different continuous cropping spans significantly affect microbial community membership and structure in a vanilla-grown soil as revealed by deep pyrosequencing[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2015, 70(1):209-218.
[6] Cheng F, Cheng Z H, Meng H W. Transcriptomic insights into the allelopathic effects of the garlic allelochemical diallyl disulfide on tomato roots[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:38902.
[7] Ding H, Cheng Z, Liu M, et al. Garlic exerts allelopathic effects on pepper physiology in a hydroponic co-culture system[J]. Biology Open, 2016, 5:1-7
[8] Renaud M,Chelinho S, Alvarenga P, et al. Organic wastes as soil amendments-effects assessment towards soil invertebrates[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 330:149-156.
[9] 高亚娟. 草莓连作障碍土壤改良技术研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2013.
[10] 李保会. 复合微生物菌肥对连作草莓矿质养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2007, 30(3):44-47.
[11] 张艳杰, 杨淑, 陈英化, 等. 玫瑰黄链霉菌防治番茄连作障碍及对土壤微生物区系的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(8):122-127.
[12] 殷振江, 周勇, 张宇, 等. 浅析温室番茄连作障碍防控技术[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2015, 61(7):109-111.
[13] 郑雪芳, 朱育菁, 刘波, 等. 番茄青枯病植物疫苗胶悬剂的制德及其对病害的防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2):208-211.
[14] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1986.
[15] Murphy C E, Lemerle D. Continuous cropping systems and weed selection[J]. Euphtica, 2006, 148(1):61-73.
[16] 刘润进, 陈应龙. 菌根学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2007.
[17] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008-1010.
[18] 李鹏. 植物基质对土壤生态改良的效果研究[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2015, 31(12):20-21.
[19] 朱虹, 王文杰, 祖元刚, 等.树皮土基质和降盐碱剂对盐碱土的改良效应[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(7):42-48.
[20] 刘素慧, 刘世琦, 张自坤, 等. 大蒜连作对其根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(5):1000-1006.
[21] Yao X H, Min H, Lu Z H, et al. Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, 42(2):120-126.
[22] Lagomarsin A, Benedetti A, Marinari S, et al. Soil organic C variability and microbial functions in a Mediterranean agro-forest ecosystem[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soil, 2011, 47(3):283-291.
[23] Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, et al. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 75(1):43-48.
[24] 郭永盛, 李鲁华, 危常州, 等. 施氮肥对新疆荒漠草原生物量和土壤酶海活性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(S1):249-256.
[25] Kábana R R, Truelove B. Effects of crop rotation and fertilization on catalase activity in a soil of the southeastern United States[J]. Plant and Soil, 1982, 69(1):97-104.
[26] Gu Y, Wang P, Kong C. Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2009, 45(5/6):436-441.
[27] Antonious G F. Impact of soil management and two botanical insecticides on urease and invertase acitivity[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B:Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 2003, 38(4):479-488.
[28] 孙彩霞, 陈利军, 武志杰. Bt杀虫晶体蛋白的土壤残留及其对土壤磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(5):761-765.
[29] 张晓鹏, 刘雅亭. 土壤处理剂对黄瓜连作土壤中土壤酶活性及黄瓜品质影响的试验[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2015, 10:4-6.
[30] 万年鑫, 郑顺林, 周少猛, 等. 薯玉轮作对马铃薯根区土壤养分及酶活效应分析[J]. 浙江大学学报, 2016, 42(1):74-80.
[31] Anna P D, Przemyslaw C. The impact of the soil sealing degree on microbial biomass, enzymatic activity and physicochemical properties in the Ekranic Technosols of Torun[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(1):47-59.
[32] Li L, Feng X, Tang M, et al. Antibacterial activity of Lansiumamide B to tobacco bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)[J]. Microbiology Research, 2014, 169(8):522-526.
[33] 伍朝荣, 黄飞, 高阳, 等. 土壤生物消毒对土壤改良、青枯菌抑菌及番茄生长的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(8):1173-1180.
[34] 张震, 张炳欣, 喻景权. 黄瓜土传病害拮抗菌分离鉴定及生物活性测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2004, 16(3):151-155.
[35] Raza W, Ling N, Liu D, et al. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WR-1 restrict the growth and virulence traits of Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. Microbiological Research, 2016, 192:103-113.
[36] Zhou T, Chen D, Li C, et al. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas brassicacearum J12 as an antagonist against Ralstonia solanacearum and identification of its antimicrobial components[J]. Microbiology Research, 2012, 167(7):384-394.

设施番茄连作障碍土壤修复及其对青枯病害的防治效果

Soil Restoration for Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Tomato Greenhouse Field and the Control Effect against Bacterial Wilt Disease

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

联系我们

[1]	郑雪芳, 刘波, 朱育菁, 葛慈斌, 刘国红. 番茄青枯病生防芽胞杆菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2016, 32(5): 657-665.
[2]	乔俊卿, 陈志谊, 梁雪杰, 刘永锋, 刘邮洲. 枯草芽孢杆菌Bs916防治番茄青枯病[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2016, 32(2): 229-234.
[3]	康贻军1,2 , 沈敏1 , 王欢莉1 , 赵庆新1 , 殷士学2 . 两株植物根际促生菌对番茄青枯病的生物防治效果评价[J]. , 2012, 28(2): 255-261.
[4]	刘邮洲1 , 陈志谊1 , 梁雪杰1 , 朱剑花2 . 番茄枯萎病和青枯病拮抗细菌的筛选、评价与鉴定[J]. , 2012, 28(1): 101-108.
[5]	黎起秦1,2 ;叶云峰2 ;蒙显英2 ;彭好文2 ;林纬2 ;罗宽1 . 内生细菌B₄₇菌株的鉴定及其对番茄青枯病的防效测定[J]. , 2005, 21(3): 178-182.
[6]	任欣正; 申道林; 方中达. 无致病力产细菌素拮抗菌MA-7防治番茄青枯病研究初报[J]. , 1988, 4(2): 62-64.