南方小花蝽-蚕豆-蚕豆蚜载体植物系统对茶叶害虫的控制效果

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.05.008

中国生物防治学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 936-945.DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.05.008

南方小花蝽-蚕豆-蚕豆蚜载体植物系统对茶叶害虫的控制效果

刘梅¹, 张昌容², 班菲雪², 刘少兰², 冉乾军², 尚小丽³, 曾广¹, 曹宇⁴, 孙月华⁵

1. 贵州大学昆虫研究所/贵州山地农业病虫害重点实验室, 贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州省农业科学院植物保护研究所, 贵阳 550006;
3. 贵州医科大学生物与工程学院生物与医学工程重点实验室, 贵阳 550025;
4. 贵阳学院生物与环境工程学院, 贵阳 550005;
5. 安顺学院农学院, 安顺 561000

收稿日期:2020-10-12 出版日期:2021-10-08 发布日期:2021-10-28
通讯作者: 张昌容,博士,副研究员,E-mail:zhangchangrong2006@163.com;班菲雪,博士,E-mail:feixueban@163.com。
作者简介:刘梅,硕士研究生,E-mail:1947165245@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31660542）；贵州省自然科学基金（2020-1Z024）；贵州省普通高等学校科技拔尖人才支持计划（KY-2016-096）；贵州省科技厅、安顺市政府、安顺学院联合基金（LH-2014-7514））；黔农科院院专项（2016-027）

Control of Tea Pests by the Banker Plant System of Orius strigicollis-Vicia faba-Aphis fabae

LIU Mei¹, ZHANG Changrong², BAN Feixue², LIU Shaolan², RAN Qianjun², SHANG Xiaoli³, ZENG Guang¹, CAO Yu⁴, SUN Yuehua⁵

1. Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of Mountainous Region/Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Institute of Plant Protection, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, School of Biology and Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China;
4. College of Biology and Engineering of Environment, Guiyang University, Guiyang 550005, China;
5. Agricultural College of Anshun University, Anshun 561000, China

Received:2020-10-12 Online:2021-10-08 Published:2021-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 载体植物系统作为一种新型的生物防治手段，具有良好的防治效果和应用价值。蚕豆蚜Aphis fabae偏好豆科植物，对茶树安全，且作为猎物可满足南方小花蝽Orius strigicollis生长和繁殖的需要。因此本研究以蚕豆蚜作为替代猎物、蚕豆Vicia faba作为载体植物及南方小花蝽作为天敌昆虫构建“南方小花蝽-蚕豆-蚕豆蚜”载体植物系统来防治茶叶害虫。为探究该载体系统是否可有效控制茶叶害虫，本研究事先在室内比较了该载体植物系统与直接释放南方小花蝽对茶蚜Toxoptera aurnantii的防治效果；之后在田间调查中发现茶树上主要有茶蚜、茶棍蓟马Dendrothrips minowai及小贯小绿叶蝉Empoasca onukii共3种害虫混合发生，且它们均可被南方小花蝽捕食，因此在田间试验中本研究同时评价了载体植物系统及直接释放南方小花蝽对这3种害虫的防治效果。结果显示：在室内试验中，载体植物系统与直接释放南方小花蝽相比，在前3次调查中茶蚜种群数量显著降低，且虫口减退率及防治效果均显著高于直接释放南方小花蝽，其中载体植物系统对茶蚜的控制效果最高可达92.16%，而直接释放南方小花蝽对茶蚜的防治效果仅为72.25%，表明该载体植物系统有应用于田间防治茶叶害虫的潜力。在田间试验中，载体植物的布局（条状、块状及点状）对载体植物系统的防治效果无显著影响；载体植物系统与直接释放南方小花蝽均对小贯小绿叶蝉有显著的防治效果，且最高防效均在90%左右，但对茶蚜及茶棍蓟马则无明显的控制作用，表明载体植物系统与直接释放南方小花蝽均可用于茶叶害虫的防治，但在应用时需考虑到多种害虫同时发生对防治效果的影响。

关键词: 南方小花蝽, 蚕豆蚜, 载体植物系统, 茶蚜, 小贯小绿叶蝉, 茶棍蓟马

Abstract: As a new biological control method, banker plant system is of high control efficacy and application value. Aphis fabae prefers leguminous plants and is safe to tea plant, and is a prey that can satisfy the growth and reproduction needs of Orius strigicollis. Therefore a banker plant system consisting of A. fabae as alternative prey, Vicia faba as banker plant, and O. strigicollis as natural enemy was established to control tea pests. The control efficacy of the banker plant system was compared with that of the direct release of O. strigicollis on the tea aphid Toxoptera aurnantii in the laboratory. T. aurnantii, Dendrothrips minowai and Empoasca onukii, the three principal pest species in tea plants, can all be preyed by O. strigicollis. The control efficacy of the banker plant system and the direct release of O. strigicollis on the three pests were also investigated in field experiment. The results showed that, in the laboratory experiment, the population size of T. aurnantii was significantly lower and the population decline rate and control efficacy of T. aumantii were significantly higher in the banker plant system than in the direct release of O. strigicollis in the first three surveys. The banker plant system achieved control efficacy as high as 92.16%, while the direct release of O. strigicollis reached control efficacy of only 72.25%, indicating a potential of the banker plant system to be used in the field for tea pest control. In the field experiment, the layout of the banker plants (strips, blocks and dots) showed no significant influence on the control efficacy of tea pests. Both the banker plant system and the direct release of O. strigicollis resulted in significant control of E. onukii, as high as 90%, but they did not have significant control of T. aurnantii and D. minowai. These results indicate potential of both the banker plant system and the direct release of O. strigicollis for control of tea pests, but depending on the co-occurring pest species.

Key words: Orius strigicollis, Aphis fabae, banker plants system, Toxoptera aurnantii, Empoasca onukii, Dendrothrips minowai

中图分类号:

S476.2

刘梅, 张昌容, 班菲雪, 刘少兰, 冉乾军, 尚小丽, 曾广, 曹宇, 孙月华. 南方小花蝽-蚕豆-蚕豆蚜载体植物系统对茶叶害虫的控制效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2021, 37(5): 936-945.

LIU Mei, ZHANG Changrong, BAN Feixue, LIU Shaolan, RAN Qianjun, SHANG Xiaoli, ZENG Guang, CAO Yu, SUN Yuehua. Control of Tea Pests by the Banker Plant System of Orius strigicollis-Vicia faba-Aphis fabae[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2021, 37(5): 936-945.

参考文献

[1] 郑龙章. 茶农使用农药行为影响因素研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2009.
[2] Van Lenteren J C. The state of commercial augmentative biological control:plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake[J]. Biological Control, 2012, 57(1):1-20.
[3] Frank S D. Biological control of arthropod pests using banker plant systems:past progress and future directions[J]. Biological Control, 2010, 52(1):8-16.
[4] 肖英方, 毛润乾, 沈国清, 等. 害虫生物防治新技术——载体植物系统[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2012, 28(1):1-8.
[5] 陈学新, 刘银泉, 任顺祥, 等. 害虫天敌的植物支持系统[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2014, 51(1):1-12.
[6] 潘明真, 刘同先. 载体植物在温室作物害虫生物防治中的应用[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(5):917-926.
[7] 李姝, 王杰, 黄宁兴, 等. 捕食性天敌储蓄植物系统研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19):3975-3987.
[8] Xiao Y F, Osborne L S, Chen J J, et al. Evaluation of corn plant as potential banker plant for supporting predatory gall midge, Feltiella acarisuga (Diptera:Cecidomyiidae) against Tetranychus urticae (Acari:Tetranychidae) in greenhouse vegetable production[J]. Crop Protection, 2011, 30(12):1635-1642.
[9] Xiao Y F, Avery P, Chen J J, et al. Ornamental pepper as banker plants for establishment of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari:Phytoseiidae) for biological control of multiple pests in greenhouse vegetable production[J]. Biological Control, 2012, 63(3):279-286.
[10] 郑许松, 田俊策, 钟列权, 等. "秕谷草-伪褐飞虱-中华淡翅盲蝽"载体植物系统的可行性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3):941-946.
[11] Van Lentern J C. Commercial mass production and pricing of organisms for biological control of pests in Europe[J]. Biological Control, 1997, 10(2):143-149.
[12] Rehman S U, Zhou X M, Ali S, et al. Predatory functional response and fitness parameters of Orius strigicollis Poppius when fed Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum as determined by age-stage, two-sex life table[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8:e9540.
[13] Tuan S J, Yang C M, Chung Y T, et al. Comparison of demographic parameters and predation rates of Orius strigicollis (Hemiptera:Anthocoridae) fed on eggs of Tetranychus urticae (Acari:Tetranychidae) and Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2016, 109(4):1529-1538.
[14] Shibao M, Tanaka H. Control of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) on greenhouse eggplant by releasing of Orius strigicollis (Poppius)[J]. Annual Report of the Kansai Plant Protection Society, 2000, 42:27-30.
[15] Wong S K, Frank S D. Influence of banker plants and spiders on biological control by Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera:Anthocoridae)[J]. Biological Control, 2012, 63(2):181-187.
[16] Wong S K, Frank S D. Pollen increases fitness and abundance of Orius insidiosus Say (Heteroptera:Anthocoridae) on banker plants[J]. Biological Control, 2013, 64(1):45-50.
[17] Zhao J, Guo X J, Tan X L, et al. Using Calendula officinalis as a floral resource to enhance aphid and thrips suppression by the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera:Anthocoridae)[J]. Pest Management Science, 2017, 73(3):515-520.
[18] 张昌容, 郅军锐, 莫利锋. 四种猎物对南方小花蝽生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(18):5646-5652.
[19] 李慧玲, 吴光远, 王定锋, 等. 茶蚜生物学及综合防治研究进展[J]. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(12):1265-1270.
[20] 贺伯虎, 张书香. 贵州晴普茶区茶棍蓟马发生特点及防治措施[J]. 贵州茶叶, 2016(4):23-24.
[21] 刘超, 蒲德强, 黄琼, 等. 不同药剂对小贯小绿叶蝉的防治效果[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(17):67-68, 144.
[22] 张骏, 郅军锐, 杨成源, 等. 贵州省农田小花蝽种类调查及鉴定[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2015, 34(1):36-40.
[23] 雷小涛, 司升云, 王香萍, 等. 4种杀虫剂对水芹扶桑绵粉蚧的防治效果评价[J]. 蔬菜, 2013(1):64-65.
[24] Pratt P D, Croft B A. Banker plants:Evaluation of release strategies for predatory mites[J]. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 2000, 18(4):207-211.
[25] Desneux N, O'Neil R J. Potential of an alternative prey to disrupt predation of the generalist predator, Orius insidiosus, on the pest aphid, Aphis glycines, via short-term indirect interactions[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2008, 98(6):631-639.
[26] Wang T, Zhang P, Ma C, et al. Is Orius sauteri poppius a promising biological control agent for Walnut Aphids? An assessment from the laboratory to field[J]. Insects, 2021, 12(12):25.
[27] 张昌容, 郅军锐, 莫利锋. 不同猎物饲喂对南方小花蝽捕食量和喜好性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(9):2728-2733.

南方小花蝽-蚕豆-蚕豆蚜载体植物系统对茶叶害虫的控制效果

Control of Tea Pests by the Banker Plant System of Orius strigicollis-Vicia faba-Aphis fabae

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

联系我们

[1]	孙英, 胡昌雄, 吴道慧, 陈国华, 殷红慧, 徐天养, 陈婷, 张晓明. 南方小花蝽和黄蓟马的种群动态及捕食功能反应[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2021, 37(3): 451-458.
[2]	刘梅, 张昌容, 尚小丽, 郭军, 曾广, 石乐娟. 南方小花蝽对非洲菊上西花蓟马控制效果评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(6): 992-996.
[3]	曾广, 郅军锐, 张昌容, 叶茂, 张涛. 低温驯化对南方小花蝽冷藏的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(1): 20-23.
[4]	张昌容, 郅军锐. 阶段性组合猎物饲养南方小花蝽的效果评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2017, 33(2/3): 345-350.
[5]	莫利锋, 郅军锐, 陈祥叶. 温度对南方小花蝽捕食西花蓟马功能反应的影响[J]. , 2013, 29(2): 187-193.
[6]	肖英方1,2 , 毛润乾1,3 , 沈国清4 , Lance S. Osborne1 . 害虫生物防治新技术——载体植物系统[J]. , 2012, 28(1): 1-8.