利用黑肩绿盲蝽兼性取食特性评价转基因水稻生态风险

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2016.03.005

中国生物防治学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 311-317.DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2016.03.005

利用黑肩绿盲蝽兼性取食特性评价转基因水稻生态风险

蒋显斌¹, 黄芊¹, 凌炎², 陈玉冲³, 吴碧球², 黄所生², 李成², 符诚强¹, 黄凤宽², 龙丽萍¹

1. 广西农业科学院水稻研究所/广西水稻遗传育种重点实验室, 南宁 530007;
2. 广西农业科学院植物保护研究所, 南宁 530007;

3. 广西农业科学院, 南宁 530007

收稿日期:2015-07-09 出版日期:2016-06-08 发布日期:2016-06-07
通讯作者: 龙丽萍
作者简介:蒋显斌(1979-),男,博士,副研究员,E-mail:jiangxianbin@yahoo.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31360437,31560510);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201403031,201303017);广西农业科学院基本科研业务专项(桂农科2014YP08,2015YT18,2016YM30,2016JZ33)

Ecological Risk Assessment of Transgenic Rice by Using the Facultative Feeding of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis

JIANG Xianbin¹, HUANG Qian¹, LING Yan², CHEN Yuchong³, WU Biqiu², HUANG Suosheng², LI Cheng², FU Chengqiang¹, HUANG Fengkuan², LONG Liping¹

1. Institute of Rice Research, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rice Genetics and Breeding, Nanning 530007, China;
2. Institute of Plant Protection, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China;
3. Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China

Received:2015-07-09 Online:2016-06-08 Published:2016-06-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 转基因作物对天敌昆虫的影响是转基因生态安全研究的一个重要内容。本文通过室内试验,研究了黑肩绿盲蝽兼性取食褐飞虱蜜露和稻株伤流液可能带来的潜在生态风险。结果表明,黑肩绿盲蝽取食褐飞虱蜜露,雌、雄成虫寿命分别为75.9和67.5d,比蒸馏水对照组显著延长,雌成虫捕食褐飞虱卵的能力为23粒/日,比蒸馏水对照下降;取食稻株伤流液的雌成虫寿命(58.1d)延长,捕食能力(24.9粒/日)下降;无论黑肩绿盲蝽取食褐飞虱蜜露或稻株伤流液,转基因水稻Bar68-1对黑肩绿盲蝽成虫寿命(雌67.6d,雄61d)和捕食能力(24.9粒/日)的影响,与非转基因亲本对照D68和非转基因感虫对照TN1的一致。研究表明,兼性取食转基因抗除草剂水稻Bar68-1稻株伤流液和褐飞虱蜜露,没有给稻田重要捕食性天敌黑肩绿盲蝽增加新的生态风险。

关键词: 转基因水稻, 黑肩绿盲蝽, 褐飞虱, 兼性取食, 蜜露, 伤流液

Abstract: The effect of genetically modified (GM) crops on natural enemies is an essential part of ecological safety assessment of GM crops. The potential risk of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) rice Bar68-1 on Cyrtorhinus lividipennis, a natural enemy for the brown planthopper (BPH) with facultative feeding on honeydew of BPH and bleeding sap of rice plants, was evaluated in the laboratory. Results showed that longevity of male (67.5 d) and female (75.9 d) adults of C. lividipennis fed on BPH honeydew was significantly longer than those in the BPH fed water only (control). The longevity of female adults fed on bleeding sap of rice plants (58.1 d) was prolonged, too. However, the number of BPH eggs preyed by C. lividipennis per day significantly decreased in female adult of C. lividipennis fed BPH honeydew (23) and bleeding sap of rice plants (24.9). The adult longevity (male 61 d, female 67.6 d) and predatory capacity (24.9 eggs preyed per day) of C. lividipennis fed GMHT rice Bar68-1 were not significantly different from those of the insects fed untransformed parental cultivar D68 or a BPH-susceptible rice variety, Taichung Native 1, whether C. lividipennis was fed plant bleeding sap or BPH honeydew. The results suggest that adult longevity and predatory capacity of C. lividipennis are not affected by GMHT Rice Bar68-1 regardless of its facultative feeding on BPH honeydew or plant bleeding sap, so the transgenic rice will not bring new ecological risks to one of the most important predators of BPH in rice ecosystem.

Key words: transgenic rice, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis, Nilaparvata lugens, facultative feeding, honeydew, bleeding sap

中图分类号:

蒋显斌, 黄芊, 凌炎, 陈玉冲, 吴碧球, 黄所生, 李成, 符诚强, 黄凤宽, 龙丽萍. 利用黑肩绿盲蝽兼性取食特性评价转基因水稻生态风险[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2016, 32(3): 311-317.

JIANG Xianbin, HUANG Qian, LING Yan, CHEN Yuchong, WU Biqiu, HUANG Suosheng, LI Cheng, FU Chengqiang, HUANG Fengkuan, LONG Liping. Ecological Risk Assessment of Transgenic Rice by Using the Facultative Feeding of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis[J]. journal1, 2016, 32(3): 311-317.

参考文献

[1] Gilbert N. A hard look at GM crops[J]. Nature, 2013, 497(7447): 24-26.
[2] 吴孔明. 中国转基因作物的环境安全评介与风险管理[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2014, 33(6): 112-114.
[3] 蒋显斌, 肖国樱. 转基因抗除草剂水稻对稻田叶冠层节肢动物群落多样性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(6): 1277-1283.
[4] 蒋显斌, 肖国樱. 抗除草剂转基因水稻对稻纵卷叶螟田间自然种群的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2011, 37(2): 50-54.
[5] 叶恭银, 陈洋, 田俊策, 等. 转Bt基因抗虫作物对非靶标生物的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2011, 37(6): 1-10.
[6] Chen Y, Tian J C, Wang W, et al. Bt rice expressing Cry1Ab does not stimulate an outbreak of its non-target herbivore, Nilaparvata lugen[J]. Transgenic Research, 2012, 21(2): 279-291.
[7] Yuan Y Y, Xiao N W, Krogh P H, et al. Laboratory assessment of the impacts of transgenic Bt rice on the ecological fitness of the soil non-target arthropod, Folsomia candida (Collembola: Isotomidae)[J]. Transgenic Research, 2013, 22(4): 791-803.
[8] 傅强, 赖凤香, 陈洋, 等. 抗虫转基因水稻对非靶标生物的生态安全性研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49(7): 655-663.
[9] Lu Z B, Han N S, Tian J C, et al. Transgenic cry1Ab/vip3H+ epsps rice with insect and herbicide resistance acted no adverse impacts on the population growth of a non-target herbivore, the white-backed planthopper, under laboratory and field conditions[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(12): 2678-2689.
[10] Jiang X B, Huang Q, Ling Y, et al. Functional and numerical responses of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis to eggs of Nilaparvata lugens are not affected by genetically modified herbicide-tolerant rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(10): 2019-2026.
[11] Cheng J. Rice planthoppers in the past half century in China//Heong K L, Cheng J, Escalada M M, eds. Rice Planthoppers[M]. Springer Netherlands, 2015, 1-32.
[12] Chen M, Liu Z C, Ye G Y, et al. Impacts of transgenic cry1Ab rice on non-target planthoppers and their main predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis (Hemiptera: Miridae)-A case study of the compatibility of Bt rice with biological control[J]. Biological Control, 2007, 42(2): 242-250.
[13] 蒋显斌, 肖国樱. 抗除草剂转基因水稻对二种刺吸性害虫和二种天敌的影响[J]. 昆虫知识, 2010, 47(6): 1128-1133.
[14] Han Y, Meng J, Chen J, et al. Bt rice expressing Cry2Aa does not harm Cyrtorhinus lividipennis, a main predator of the nontarget herbivore Nilapavarta lugens[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(11): e112315.
[15] 王文晶, 王瑞林, 于福兰, 等. 转Bt水稻对捕食性天敌黑肩绿盲蝽种群动态的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2014, 51(5): 1173-1183.
[16] 吴伟坚, 余金咏, 梁广文. 盲蝽科昆虫的食性[J]. 昆虫知识, 2003, 40(2): 108-111.
[17] Lu Y H, Wu K M, Jiang Y Y, et al. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China[J]. Science, 2010, 328(5982): 1151-1154.
[18] 朱平阳, 吕仲贤, Gurr G, 等. 显花植物在提高节肢动物天敌控制害虫中的生态功能[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2012, 28(4): 583-588.
[19] 俞晓平, 胡萃, Heong K L. 黑肩绿盲蝽在寄生植物、飞虱和叶蝉卵上的生长和发育[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1996, 10(4): 220-226.
[20] Sivapragasam A, Asma A. Development and reproduction of the mirid bug, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis (Heteroptera: Miridae) and its functional response to the brown planthopper[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 1985, 20(4): 373-379.
[21] 陆宴辉, 史晓利, 仲崇翔, 等. 蜜露对天敌昆虫生长繁殖及搜寻行为的影响[J]. 昆虫知识, 2005, 42(4): 379-385.
[22] Xiao G Y, Yuan L P, Sun S S M. Strategy and utilization of a herbicide resistance gene in two-line hybrid rice[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2007, 20(3): 287-292.
[23] 吕仲贤, 俞晓平, Heong K L, 等. 稻田氮肥施用量对黑肩绿盲蝽捕食功能的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48(1): 48-56.
[24] 娄永根, 程家安. 稻飞虱灾变机理及可持续治理的基础研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(2): 231-238.
[25] 黄琼, 伊力哈木·托合迪, 艾尔肯·依不拉音. 植物伤流液的研究和应用[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2013, 36(11): 1573-1576.
[26] 娄永根, 杜孟浩, 郭华伟, 等. 水稻品种对黑肩绿盲蝽生长, 发育, 存活及繁殖的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2002, 29(3): 193-198.
[27] 孙定炜, 苏建亚, 沈晋良, 等. 杀虫剂对褐飞虱捕食性天敌黑肩绿盲蝽的安全性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(7): 1995-2002.
[28] 朱平阳, 盛仙俏, 方德华, 等. 黑肩绿盲蝽成虫取食植物花后对下一代生长和捕食能力的影响[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2013, 33(10): 17-21.
[29] Christou P. Plant genetic engineering and agricultural biotechnology 1983-2013[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2013, 31(3): 125-127.
[30] James C. 2014年全球生物技术/转基因作物商业化发展态势[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2015, 35(1): 1-14.
[31] 徐秀秀, 韩兰芝, 彭于发, 等. 转基因抗虫水稻的研发与应用及在我国的发展策略[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2013, 35(2): 242-252.
[32] 张青玲, 李云河, 华红霞, 等. Bt水稻田重要非靶标节肢动物暴露于Cry2Aa蛋白的程度分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(6): 1647-1651.
[33] 田俊策, 陈洋, 李兆亮, 等. 转cry1Ab基因水稻和两种杀虫剂对非靶标天敌拟环纹豹蛛免疫影响的评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2011, 27(4): 559-563.
[34] 程式华, 李建. 现代中国水稻[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2007.
[35] 帕梅拉·罗纳德, 拉乌尔·亚当查克//蒋显斌, 译. 明日的餐桌[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2016.
[36] Ahmad P, Ashraf M, Younis M, et al. Role of transgenic plants in agriculture and biopharming[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2012, 30(3): 524-540.
[37] 李云河, 彭于发, 李香菊, 等. 转基因耐除草剂作物的环境风险及管理[J]. 植物学报, 2012, 47(3): 197-208.
[38] 肖国樱, 陈芬, 孟秋成, 等. 我国转基因抗除草剂水稻的生态风险与控制[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2015, 23(1): 1-11.
[39] Brandenberg O, Hodson De Jaramillo E, Sensi A, et al. Biosafety Resource Book[M]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011.

利用黑肩绿盲蝽兼性取食特性评价转基因水稻生态风险

Ecological Risk Assessment of Transgenic Rice by Using the Facultative Feeding of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

联系我们

[1]	钟玉琪, 廖晓兰, 侯茂林. 黑肩绿盲蝽成虫的低温贮藏[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(4): 545-550.
[2]	张珏锋, 陈建明, 舒金平, 李芳, 钟海英, 吴鸿. 黄绿绿僵菌侵染对褐飞虱部分生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(5): 701-707.
[3]	何林懋, 申屠旭萍, 李丹婷, 孙帆, 俞晓平. 杀菌剂与吡虫啉混合配剂对褐飞虱种群增长的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(2): 280-286.
[4]	陈静, 张道伟, 钱正敏. 褐飞虱两个酚氧化酶原基因的特性及细菌诱导后的表达分析[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(1): 44-51.
[5]	陈怡, 杨艳, 朱昊俊, 高彦杰, 陈秀萍, 彭于发. 转cry1C,cry2A基因水稻对稻田浮游动物群落物种多样性的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2017, 33(4): 454-462.
[6]	沈嘉炜, 刘志超, 蔡尤俊, 张文庆. 水稻品种多样性对褐飞虱及蜘蛛的影响[J]. , 2015, 31(3): 327-332.
[7]	齐会会1 , 张云慧1 , 蒋春先2 , 武俊杰1,2 , 程登发1 . 黑肩绿盲蝽与褐飞虱的伴迁行为研究[J]. , 2014, 30(2): 171-177.
[8]	王召, 杨洪, 汪学俭, 金道超. 贵州喀斯特稻区黑肩绿盲蝽种群发生规律研究[J]. , 2011, 27(4): 464-469 .
[9]	陈洋1 , 田俊策1 , 彭于发2 , 郭予元2 , 叶恭银1 . 转cry1Ab/vip3H基因水稻对非靶标害虫褐飞虱连续多代生长发育与繁殖的影响[J]. , 2011, 27(4): 490-497 .
[10]	田俊策1 , 陈洋1 , 李兆亮1 , 彭于发2 , 叶恭银1 . 转cry1Ab基因水稻和两种杀虫剂对非靶标天敌拟环纹豹蛛免疫影响的评价[J]. , 2011, 27(4): 559-563 .
[11]	贾春生. 侵染黑肩绿盲蝽的突破虫霉新记录[J]. , 2011, 27(3): 338-343.
[12]	李兆亮1 , 姚洪渭1 , 陈洋1 , 田俊策1 , 彭于发2 , 叶恭银1 . 取食转Bt基因水稻褐飞虱对杀虫剂的敏感性及其代谢酶的活性[J]. , 2011, 27(1): 55-62.
[13]	邵敏;吴智丹;陈宝君;落桑次仁;李林 . 转hrf1基因水稻对稻曲病抗性分析[J]. , 2008, 24(4): 335-338.
[14]	邵敏, 李林, 穆东升, 肖姗姗, 杨秀玲, 王宏乐, 刘新民, 王金生. Harpin_xoo在水稻中表达提高对白叶枯病不同小种抗性[J]. , 2006, 22(2): 133-136.
[15]	郑许松; 俞晓平; 吕仲贤; 陈建明; 徐红星; 鞠瑞亭. 蔗虱缨小蜂对褐飞虱卵的寄生适应性[J]. , 2003, 19(3): 136-138.