黄瓜土传病害拮抗细菌的筛选、鉴定及生防特性研究

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2022.08.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了有效防治黄瓜的土传病害，本文从黄瓜根际土壤中分离得到256株细菌，利用平板对峙试验筛选到一株拮抗菌ZM-1。通过形态、生理生化和分子生物学方法对菌株进行鉴定，测定菌株产生的抑菌物质。通过正交实验法与单因素法对菌株进行发酵优化，并通过盆栽试验测定菌株防病能力。结果表明，菌株ZM-1为铜绿假单胞菌Pseudomonas aeruginosa，该菌对黄瓜枯萎病菌Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumebrium 和黄瓜疫病菌Phytophthora drechsleri的抑制率分别为62.80%和65.58%。该菌株可以产生纤维素酶、铁载体等多种抑菌物质。经过最佳发酵优化，菌株发酵液菌含量可达到1×10¹⁰ cfu/mL以上。最适发酵培养基配方为蔗糖5 g/L、胰蛋白胨10 g/L、K₂HPO₄ 10 g/L，发酵条件温度25 ℃、pH 7.5、时间48 h、接种量2%。盆栽试验表明，菌株ZM-1对黄瓜枯萎病和黄瓜疫病的防效分别为53.97%和51.11%。本研究表明拮抗菌ZM-1在防治黄瓜土传病害方面具有开发应用的潜力。

关键词: 黄瓜疫病, 黄瓜枯萎病, 铜绿假单胞菌, 鉴定, 发酵, 生物防治

Abstract: In order to effectively control soil-borne diseases of cucumber, 256 strains of bacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of cucumber, and an antagonistic strain ZM-1 was screened by the plate confrontation method. Based on physiological, biochemical and molecular biological analysis, the strain ZM-1 was identified to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The inhibition rate of the strain against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumebrium and Phytophthora drechsleri were 62.80% and 65.58%, respectively. The strain can produce a variety of antibacterial substances, such as cellulase, siderophore and so on. The fermentation optimization of the strain was carried out by orthogonal experiment method and single factor method. After optimization, the bacterial amount in the fermentation broth of the strain can reach more than 1×10¹⁰cfu/ml. The optimal fermentation conditions were 5 g/L of sucrose, 10 g/L of tryptone, 10 g/L of K₂HPO₄, pH value of 7.5, continuous fermentation for 48 h, with 2% inoculation quantity under temperature of 25 ℃. Pot experiment showed that the relative control efficacies of strain ZM-1 against cucumber fusarium wilt and cucumber blight were 53.97% and 51.11%, respectively. The above results indicate that the antagonist strain ZM-1 has potential for development and application in the control of soil-borne diseases of cucumber.

Key words: cucumber blight, cucumber Fusarium wilt, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, identification, fermentation, biological control

中图分类号:

S436.42

魏靖宇, 韩雨桐, 翟文旭, 卫勇, 李宝通, 刘慧芹. 黄瓜土传病害拮抗细菌的筛选、鉴定及生防特性研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1582-1591.

WEI Jingyu, HAN Yutong, ZHAI Wenxu, WEI Yong, LI Baotong, LIU Huiqin. Screening, Identification and Biocontrol Characteristics of Antagonistic Bacteria against Cucumber Soil-borne Diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2022, 38(6): 1582-1591.

参考文献

[1] 李世东, 缪作清, 高卫东. 我国农林园艺作物土传病害发生和防治现状及对策分析[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2011, 27(4): 433-440.
[2] 梁肇均, 林毓娥, 何晓明, 等. 黄瓜土传性病害的发生与防治技术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2019, (7): 52-54.
[3] 李进一, 卢彩鸽, 刘霆, 等. 短密木霉新菌株BF06对黄瓜土传病害的防治效果与促生作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(3): 449-460.
[4] 吕恒, 牛永春, 邓晖, 等. 根际真菌对黄瓜土传病害的抑制作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(12): 3759-3765.
[5] 赵帅, 杜春梅, 田长彦. 黄瓜枯萎病综合防治研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(7): 254-259.
[6] Raza W, Ling N, Zhang R, et al. Success evaluation of the biological control of Fusarium wilts of cucumber, banana, and tomato since 2000 and future research strategies[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2017, 37(2): 202-212.
[7] Moharam M H, Negim O O. Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt disease in cucumber with improvement of growth and mineral uptake using some antagonistic formulations[J]. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 2012, 77(3): 53-63.
[8] Luo M, Chen Y, He J, et al. Identification of a new Talaromyces strain DYM25 isolated from the Yap Trench as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium wilt of cucumber[J]. Microbiological Research, 2021, 251: 126841.
[9] 周珍, 向阳, 解娜, 等. 黄瓜疫霉菌拮抗菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2015(6): 31-34.
[10] 王莉, 米佳雯, 池明, 等. 解淀粉芽胞杆菌DS-1菌剂的研制及田间应用效果[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(5): 64-69.
[11] Pikovoskaya R I. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species[J]. Mikrobiologiya, 1948, 17: 362-370.
[12] 张帆, 李树垚, 张子豪, 等. 铜绿假单胞菌检测方法的比较与优化[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(3): 67-74.
[13] 东秀珠, 蔡妙英. 常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
[14] Zhai Y, Zhu J X, Tan T M, et al. Isolation and characterization of antagonistic Paenibacillus polymyxa HX-140 and its biocontrol potential against Fusarium wilt of cucumber seedlings[J]. BMC Microbiology, 2021, 21(1): 75.
[15] Ren R, Yang X, Song A, et al. Control of Phytophthora melonis damping-off treated with 24-epibrassinolide and a histological study of cucumber hypocotyl[J]. Protoplasma, 2020, 257(6): 1519-1529.
[16] Chandra H, Kumari P, Bisht R, et al. Plant growth promoting Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Valeriana wallichii displays antagonistic potential against three phytopathogenic fungi[J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2020, 47(8): 6015-6026.
[17] Yasmin S, Hafeez F, Rasul G. Evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Z5 for biocontrol of cotton seedling disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2014, 24(11): 1227-1242.
[18] Hu S, Wang X, Sun W, et al. In vitro study of biocontrol potential of rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa against pathogenic fungi of saffron (Crocus sativus L.)[J]. Pathogens, 2021, 10(11): 1423.
[19] Bano N, Musarrat J. Characterization of a new Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NJ-15 as a potential biocontrol agent[J]. Current microbiology, 2003, 46(5): 324-328.
[20] Sayyed R Z, Patel P R. Biocontrol potential of siderophore producing heavy metal resistant Alcaligenes sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa RZS3 vis-à-vis organophosphorus fungicide[J]. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2011, 51(3): 266-272.
[21] Solans M, Scervino J M, Messuti M I, et al. Potential biocontrol actinobacteria: Rhizospheric isolates from the Argentine Pampas lowlands legumes[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2016, 56(11): 1289-1298.
[22] Sulochana M B, Jayachandra S Y, Kumar S K, et al. Antifungal attributes of siderophore produced by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa JAS-25[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2014, 54(5): 418-424.
[23] Islam M A, Nain Z, Alam M K, et al. In vitro study of biocontrol potential of rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum[J]. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 2018, 28(1): 90.
[24] Wang X, Zhou X, Cai Z, et al. A Biocontrol strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CQ-40 promote growth and control Botrytis cinerea in tomato[J]. Pathogens, 2020, 10(1): 22.
[25] Hu S, Wang X, Sun W, et al. In vitro study of biocontrol potential of rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa against pathogenic fungi of saffron (Crocus sativus L.)[J]. Pathogens, 2021, 10(11): 1423.
[26] Rikame T, Borde M. Whole genome, functional annotation and comparative genomics of plant growth-promoting bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NG61) with potential application in agro-industry[J]. Current Microbiology, 2022, 79(6): 169.
[27] 方运玲, 孙爽, 申阅, 等. 微生物源农药申嗪霉素的研制与应用[J]. 农药学学报, 2014, 16(4): 387-393.
[28] 葛红莲, 张福丽, 刘志华. 复合菌剂PB12防治黄瓜疫病效果评价以及对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(2): 229-235.