阿维蚜茧蜂与两种色型豌豆蚜的相互作用

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2018.01.007

中国生物防治学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 65-70.DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2018.01.007

阿维蚜茧蜂与两种色型豌豆蚜的相互作用

武德功¹, 杜军利¹, 刘长仲²

1. 安徽科技学院农学院, 凤阳 233100;
2. 甘肃农业大学植物保护学院/甘肃省农作物病虫害生物防治工程实验室, 兰州 730070

收稿日期:2016-11-28 出版日期:2018-02-08 发布日期:2018-02-06
通讯作者: 刘长仲,教授,E-mail:liuchzh@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:武德功,博士,讲师,E-mail:wudegong118@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31660522）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金（20136202110007）；安徽科技学院校级引进人才（ZRC2014399）；安徽省教育厅重点项目（KJ2016A825）；安徽皖垦种业股份有限公司资助；安徽科技学院植物保护重点学科经费资助（AKZDXK2015C04）；安徽省省级质量工程项目植物保护特色专业专项（2015tszy022）

Interactions between Parasitoid Aphidius ervi and Two Color Strains of Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum

WU Degong¹, DU Junli¹, LIU Changzhong²

1. College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China;
2. College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University/Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2016-11-28 Online:2018-02-08 Published:2018-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文研究了阿维蚜茧蜂Aphidius ervi对豌豆蚜Acyrthosiphon pisum色型和龄期的选择偏好性，以及豌豆蚜的龄期对蚜茧蜂发育的影响，同时还观察了阿维蚜茧蜂与2种色型豌豆蚜共存时，2种色型豌豆蚜的掉落率。结果显示，阿维蚜茧蜂偏好寄生绿色型的豌豆蚜，而且偏好寄生龄期较小的虫态；在阿维蚜茧蜂与2种色型豌豆蚜共存时，2龄若蚜的掉落率最高；随着龄期的上升，2种色型豌豆蚜掉落后的被寄生率随之增高，而未掉落豌豆蚜的被寄生率随着龄期的增加而下降。阿维蚜茧蜂的寄生延长了2种色型豌豆蚜的发育历期，且2种色型豌豆蚜在1龄被寄生后，2和3龄的的发育历期均显著延长；寄生1龄豌豆蚜时，阿维蚜茧蜂发育最快；阿维蚜茧蜂寄生的豌豆蚜龄期越高，其羽化率就越低。

关键词: 豌豆蚜, 色型, 阿维蚜茧蜂, 偏好, 掉落, 寄生

Abstract: Aphidius ervi preference for Acyrthosiphon pisum in different colors and ages and the wasp's performance were studied. Meanwhile the falling rates of pea aphid were compared between the two color strains with co-existence of A. ervi. The results showed that:A. ervi preferred small green pea aphid, especially in their early stage; the falling rate of pea aphid peaked at the second instar with the co-existence of A. ervi. The parasitism rate of the falled pea aphids increased with aphid age while that of the non-falled ones decreased. In addition, developmental period of the parasitized pea aphid was prolonged and the second and third instars were significantly retarded when parasitism occurred at the first instar. A. ervi developed the fastest when they parasitized the first instar aphids while their eclosion decreased with the increase in the age of parasitized pea aphids.

Key words: Acyrthosiphon pisum, color morph, Aphidius ervi, preference, dropping, parasitism

中图分类号:

S433
S476.3

武德功, 杜军利, 刘长仲. 阿维蚜茧蜂与两种色型豌豆蚜的相互作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(1): 65-70.

WU Degong, DU Junli, LIU Changzhong. Interactions between Parasitoid Aphidius ervi and Two Color Strains of Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum[J]. journal1, 2018, 34(1): 65-70.

参考文献

[1] Wilkinson T L, Douglas A E. Plant penetration by pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) of different plant range[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1998, 87(1):43-50.
[2] Bommarco R, Ekbom B. Variation in pea aphid population development in three different habitats[J]. Ecological Entomology, 1996, 21(3):235-240.
[3] 杜军利, 武德功, 吕宁, 等. 不同温度条件下两种色型豌豆蚜的种群参数[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(11):91-99.
[4] He C G, Zhang X G. Field evaluation of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) for resistance to aphids in northern China[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 57(4):471-475.
[5] Tjallingii W F. Salivary secretions by aphids interacting with proteins of phloem wound responses[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57(4):739-745.
[6] 马亚玲, 刘长仲. 光周期对两种色型豌豆蚜生长发育的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(12):1476-1483.
[7] Guo S M, Kamphuis L G, Gao L L, et al. Identification of distinct quantitative trait loci associated with defence against the closely related aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum and A. kondoi in Medicago truncatula[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(10):3913-3922.
[8] Carrillo E, Rubiales D, Castillejo M A. Proteomic analysis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) response during compatible and incompatible interactions with the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum H.)[J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2014, 32(3):697-718.
[9] 洪军, 杜桂林, 贠旭疆, 等. 近10年来我国草原虫害生物防控综合配套技术的研究与推广进展[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5):303-313.
[10] 杜军利, 武德功, 张廷伟, 等. 紫外(UV-B)辐射对不同色型豌豆蚜生物学特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(11):1626-1630.
[11] Brault V, Uzest M, Monsion B, et al. Aphids as transport devices for plant viruses Les pucerons, un moyen de transport des virus de plante[J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2010, 333(6):524-538.
[12] Seye F, Bawin T, Boukraa S, et al. Effect of entomopathogenic Aspergillus strains against the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera:Aphididae)[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2014, 49(3):453-458.
[13] Harrington C D. Biological races of the pea aphid[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1945, 38(1):12-22.
[14] Libbrecht R, Gwynn, D M, Fellowes M D E. Aphidius ervi preferentially attacks the green morph of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2007, 20(1):25-32.
[15] 曹林, 李保平, 孟玲. 不同日龄混合柄瘤蚜茧蜂对寄主虫龄的选择及子代蜂发育表现[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(4):55-58.
[16] 伍绍龙, 周志成, 彭曙光, 等. 烟蚜茧蜂对不同龄期烟蚜的寄生选择及其子代发育表现[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(6):84-88.
[17] 张廷伟, 黄纯倩, 杜军利, 等. 阿尔蚜茧蜂对不同龄期豌豆蚜的寄生及后代适合度的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(7):914-918.
[18] Henry L M, Gillespie D R, Roitberg B D. Does mother really know best? Oviposition preference reduces reproductive performance in the generalist parasitoid Aphidius ervi[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2005, 116(3):167-174.
[19] Lu W N, Chiu M C, Kuo M H. Host life stage and temperature-dependent density of the symbiont Buchnera aphidicola in a subtropical pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) popultion[J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2014, 17(3):537-541.
[20] Dill L M, Fraser A H G, Roitberg B D. The economics of escape behavior in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum[J]. Oecologia, 1990, 83(4):473-478.
[21] He X Z, Wang Q, Teulon D A J. Host age preference behavior in Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera:Aphidiidae)[J]. Journal of Insect Behaviour, 2011, 24(6):447-455.
[22] Chau A, Mackauer M. Dropping of pea aphids from feeding site:a consequence of parasitism by the wasp, Monoctonus paulensis[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1997, 83(3):247-252.
[23] Takemoto H, Powell W, Pickett J, et al. Learning is involved in the response of parasitic wasps Aphidius ervi (Haliday) (Hymenoptera:Braconidae) to volatiles from a broad bean plant, Vicia faba (Fabaceae), infested by aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera:Aphididae)[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2009, 44(1):23-28.
[24] Battaglia D, Pennacchio F, Romano A, et al. The role of physical cues in the regulation of host recognition and acceptance behavior of Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera:Braconidae)[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 1995, 8(6):739-750.
[25] Braendle C, Weisser W W. Variation in escape behavior of red and green clones of the pea aphid[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2001, 14(4):497-509.
[26] Losey J E, Harmon J, Ballantyne F, et al. A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns of parasitism and predation[J]. Nature, 1997, 6639:269-272
[27] 甘明, 苗雪霞, 丁德诚. 日本柄瘤蚜茧蜂与其寄主豆蚜的相互作用:寄主龄期选择及其对发育的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2003, 46(5):598-604.
[28] 曹林, 李保平. 寄主龄期对可疑柄瘤蚜茧蜂寄生及其后代适合度的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(11):1380-1383.
[29] Ribak G, Gish M, Weihs D, et al. Adaptive aerial righting during the escape dropping of wingless pea aphids[J]. Current Biology, 2012, 23(3):102-103.
[30] Chau A, Mackauer M. Dropping of pen aphids from feeding site:consequence of parasitism by the wasp, Monoctonus paulensis[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1997, 83(3):247-252.
[31] Nussbaumer C, Schopf A. Development of the solitary larval endoparasitoid Glyptapanteles porthetriae (Hymenoptera:Braconidae) in its host Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera:Lymantriidae)[J]. European Journal of Entomol, 2013, 97(3):355-361.

阿维蚜茧蜂与两种色型豌豆蚜的相互作用

Interactions between Parasitoid Aphidius ervi and Two Color Strains of Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

联系我们

[1]	王知知, 任少鹏, 詹乐晴, 吴琼, 黄健华, 陈学新. 浙江省杨梅园果蝇及其寄生性天敌种类多样性调查[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(5): 690-696.
[2]	田俊策, 鲁艳辉, 王国荣, 郑许松, 杨亚军, 徐红星, 方琦, 叶恭银, 臧连生, 吕仲贤. 种赤眼蜂对草地贪夜蛾卵的寄生能力研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(4): 485-490.
[3]	路子云, 杨小凡, 马爱红, 冉红凡, 刘文旭, 李建成. 管侧沟茧蜂对不同日龄草地贪夜蛾幼虫的寄生效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(4): 491-495.
[4]	杨磊, 李芬, 吴少英. 草地贪夜蛾寄生蜂资源及其调控寄主免疫反应的研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(4): 496-506.
[5]	赵玳琳, 何海永, 吴石平, 陈小均, 谭清群, 杨学辉. 棘孢木霉GYSW-6m1对草莓炭疽病的生防机制及其防病促生作用研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(4): 587-595.
[6]	陈沉, 宋丽文, 左彤彤, 王悦, 南俊科, 孙守慧. 沈阳地区美国白蛾的天敌复合体[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(3): 353-360.
[7]	李梅, 田莹, 蒋细良. 植物内生木霉菌研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2): 155-162.
[8]	陈然, 唐艳龙, 唐桦, 王小艺, 杨忠岐. 麻竖毛天牛幼虫大小对松褐天牛肿腿蜂产卵决策的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(6): 848-854.
[9]	李芬, 王力奎, 吕宝乾, 曹凤勤, 潘雪莲, 袁琳琳, 吴少英. 中国海南省田间发现螟甲腹茧蜂寄生草地贪夜蛾[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(6): 992-996.
[10]	陈万斌, 李玉艳, 王孟卿, 刘晨曦, 毛建军, 陈红印, 张礼生. 草地贪夜蛾的天敌昆虫资源、应用现状及存在的问题与建议[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(5): 658-673.
[11]	王竹红, 李鹏雷, 葛均青, 郑卉娜, 周军辉, 黄建. 柑橘木虱寄生性天敌调查及一新种记述[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(4): 504-516.
[12]	尹传林, 叶昕海, 陈梦瑶, 梅洋, 肖花美, 李飞. 寄生蜂细胞色素P450基因家族进化分析[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(3): 335-342.
[13]	陈万斌, 何康来, 王勤英, 王振营. 不同品系赤眼蜂对桃蛀螟卵的寄生选择性[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(2): 167-172.
[14]	傅一峰, 刘冰, 罗延亮, 李雪玲, 王佩玲, 陆宴辉. 北疆棉田非作物生境食蚜蝇种群消长动态[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(1): 1-8.
[15]	张宇凡, 王小艺. 星天牛生物防治研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(1): 134-145.