链霉菌Sa-21对烟草黑胫病的防效及抑菌作用研究

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2022.08.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 烟草疫霉引起的烟草黑胫病，是烟草生产上的重要病害之一。为了明确链霉菌Sa-21防治烟草黑胫病的应用潜力，用盆栽试验测定了链霉菌Sa-21的生防效果，并用生长速率法等手段探讨了链霉菌Sa-21对烟草疫霉的抑菌作用。盆栽试验表明，链霉菌Sa-21菌株发酵液对苗期和成株期烟草黑胫病有较好的控制效果，最高防效可达98.39%。菌株Sa-21粗浸膏对烟草疫霉菌丝生长的抑菌中浓度为56.1 μg/mL，50 μg/mL的粗浸膏处理后可以降低50%的菌丝生物量。菌株Sa-21粗浸膏对烟草疫霉孢子囊的产生、游动孢子释放、休止孢萌发以及细胞膜透性均有抑制作用，100 μg/mL的粗浸膏基本能够完全抑制孢子囊的产生，并且对游动孢子释放的抑制率达50%以上；粗浸膏浓度为150 μg/mL时，对休止孢萌发的抑制率达94.35%；随着粗浸膏浓度增加，菌丝细胞膜的透性也会加大。研究结果表明，链霉菌Sa-21代谢物对烟草疫霉的生长繁殖产生抑制作用，并为链霉菌Sa-21生防菌剂的开发及其对烟草黑胫病的防治提供了理论依据。

关键词: 链霉菌, 烟草疫霉, 烟草黑胫病, 生物防治, 抑菌作用

Abstract: Tobacco black shank caused by Phytophthora nicotianae is one of the important diseases. This study was aimed to clarify the application potential of Streptomyces Sa-21 to the disease control and provide a reference for basic research on the biological control of tobacco black shank. The biocontrol effect of Streptomyces Sa-21 was determined by pot experiment, and the antibacterial effect of Streptomyces Sa-21 on P. nicotianae was investigated by growth rate method. In pot experiment, the control effect of fermentation solution of Streptomyces Sa-21 reached a maximum inhibition rate with 98.39% on P. nicotianae at the seedling and adult stage of tobacco. The crude extractof Streptomyces Sa-21 of reduced 50% mycelial biomass at the concentration of 50 μg/mL, and EC₅₀ of 56.1 μg/mL. The crude extract at 100 μg/mL completely inhibited the production of sporangia and 50% of sporangia release. The concentration of 150 μg/mL inhibited the germination of cystcspore by 94.35%. The results showed that Streptomyces Sa-21 metabolites could inhibit the growth and reproduction of P. nicotianae, and provided a theoretical basis for the development of Streptomyces Sa-21 biocontrol agents and the control of tobacco black shank.

Key words: Streptomyces, Phytophthora nicotianae, tobacco black shank, biological control, antibacterial effect

中图分类号:

S435.72

张潜, 袁歆瑜, 郭鑫, 邵嘉朱, 廖鑫琳, 宋振, 王嘉琦, 蒋冬花. 链霉菌Sa-21对烟草黑胫病的防效及抑菌作用研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1608-1618.

ZHANG Qian, YUAN Xinyu, GUO Xin, SHAO Jiazhu, LIAO Xinlin, SONG Zhen, WANG Jiaqi, JIANG Donghua. Study on the Antibacterial Action and Control Effect of Streptomyces Sa-21 against Phytophthora nicotianae[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2022, 38(6): 1608-1618.

参考文献

[1] 杨兵, 刘慧美, 龙章富. 微生物防治烟草黑胫病的研究进展[J]. 农药, 2015, 54(9): 629-634.
[2] 何明川, 王志江, 谢永辉, 等. 烟草黑胫病拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定及发酵条件优化[J/OL]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(2): 428-439.
[3] 曾舒泉, 钮徐融, 魏聪聪, 等, 吴国星, 金红岗. 烟草黑胫病拮抗菌HZ15的发酵条件优化[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 14-20.
[4] 黄婷, 向立刚, 庄文颖, 等. 拮抗烟草疫霉的枝穗霉菌株筛选[J]. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(9): 1-17.
[5] 汪汉成, 李文红, 冯勇刚, 等. 烟草黑胫病化学防治的历史与现状[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2011, 17(5): 96-102.
[6] 袁宗胜, 张广民, 刘延荣, 等. 烟草黑胫病菌对甲霜灵的敏感性测定[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2001(4): 9-12.
[7] Jiao R, Munir S, He P, et al. Biocontrol potential of the endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YN201732 against tobacco powdery mildew and its growth promotion[J]. Biological Control, 2019, 143: 104160.
[8] Pan Z, Munir S, Li Y, et al. Deciphering the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 as a potential antagonist of tobacco leaf mildew pathogen during flue-curing [J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12: 1502.
[9] 李娜, 陈胜, 程书锋, 等. 烟草黑胫病拮抗菌XA-1的筛选·鉴定及其抑制作用研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(1): 123-126.
[10] 黄大跃. 烟草疫霉生防菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(18): 104-106.
[11] 陈奇园, 丁钥琪, 赵世民, 等. 洛阳烟区烟株根围抗烟草疫霉放线菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(1): 22-28.
[12] 邹朔飞, 董祥立, 李继业, 等. 烟草黑胫病拮抗链霉菌筛选及田间防效试验[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2021, 40(2): 49-53.
[13] Loqman S, Barka E A, C Clément, et al. Antagonistic actinomycetes from Moroccan soil to control the grapevine gray mold[J]. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2009, 25(1): 81-91.
[14] 黄大跃. 烟草黑胫病菌拮抗菌的筛选及生防机制研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2018.
[15] 章舸. 烟草疫霉拮抗放线菌的筛选及在烟草根际定殖研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学,2021.
[16] 姜钰, 董怀玉, 徐秀德, 等. 放线菌在植病生防中的研究进展[J]. 杂粮作物, 2005(5): 329-331.
[17] 樊炳君, 曹艳茹, 赵洪莹, 等. 特殊生境放线菌在植物病害防治中的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(2): 1-4, 14.
[18] 贾雨, 贾丽苑, 黄建新. 放线菌对植物病害的防治作用及应用[J]. 西安文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2012, 15(3): 6-10.
[19] 曹滢. 一株灰霉拮抗菌的分离鉴定、生防效果评价与抑菌物质初探[D].南京农业大学,2019.
[20] 张希芬, 林伟, 李清钰, 等. 抗烟草疫霉活性木霉与芽孢杆菌共培养体系的构建与优化[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2022, 43(1): 61-68.
[21] 陈娟妮, 鲁梅, 丁伟. 纳米氧化锌对烟草疫霉菌的抑菌作用研究[J]. 植物医生, 2021, 34(2): 34-40.
[22] 赵娜, 王海丽, 魏少鹏, 等. 放线菌C-411发酵液抑菌活性及活性成分[J]. 植物保护学报, 2013, 40(1): 73-77.
[23] 王荣波, 陈姝樽, 肖小露, 等. 枯草芽胞杆菌BS193对辣椒疫霉的拮抗作用及其相关生防因子检测[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2022, 30(4): 772-782.
[24] 宋光梅, 徐莹, 张卓群, 等. 非寄主和寄主种子分泌物对大豆疫霉活性的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(4): 730-737.
[25] Liang C, Gao W, Ge T, et al. Lauric acid is a potent biological control agent that damages the cell membrane of Phytophthora sojae[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12: 666761.
[26] 孙晋跃, 刘芳, 吴海虹, 等. 超声和绿原酸联用对杀鲑气单胞菌生物膜的协同杀菌作用[J]. 现代食品科技, 2022, 38(3): 97-104.
[27] Gg A, Mpab C, Mlga B, et al. Effect of biocontrol agents and potassium phosphite against Phytophthora crown rot, caused by Phytophthora capsici, on zucchini in a closed soilless system[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 265: 109207.
[28] La Spada F, Stracquadanio C, Riolo M, et al. Trichoderma counteracts the challenge of Phytophthora nicotianae infections on tomato by modulating plant defense mechanisms and the expression of crinkler, necrosis-inducing Phytophthora protein 1, and cellulose-binding elicitor lectin pathogenic effectors[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 583539.
[29] 杨桃. 内生枯草芽孢杆菌Itb57对烟草疫霉菌的抑制机理[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2015.
[30] 黄宁珍, 区婵, 何金祥, 等. 广西岩溶区烟草黑胫病拮抗细菌的筛选鉴定及其抗病机理[J]. 广西植物, 2010, 30(6): 869-875.
[31] 覃可, 桑维钧, 陈孝玉龙, 等. 烟草拮抗链霉菌FT05W基因组测序与几丁质酶家族基因鉴定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(3): 463-473.
[32] 王游游, 蒋继志, 李明, 等. 几株拮抗细菌抑制致病疫霉孢子萌发的比较研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2017, 37(7): 16-23.