拮抗酵母菌的筛选鉴定、生物学特性及其对葡萄灰霉病菌的抑菌活性研究

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2023.02.025

中国生物防治学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 594-606.DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2023.02.025

拮抗酵母菌的筛选鉴定、生物学特性及其对葡萄灰霉病菌的抑菌活性研究

赖呈纯¹, 赖恭梯¹, 陈冰星², 潘若¹, 阙秋霞¹, 车建美²

1. 福建省农业科学院农业工程技术研究所, 福州 350002;
2. 福建省农业科学院农业生物资源研究所福州 350002

收稿日期:2022-09-20 出版日期:2023-06-08 发布日期:2023-06-25
通讯作者: 车建美,博士,研究员,E-mail:chejm2002@163.com。
作者简介:赖呈纯，博士，副研究员，E-mail：lccisland@163.com。
基金资助:
福建省属公益项目（2021R1034001，2021R1032009）；福建省人民政府中国农业科学院农业高质量发展超越“5511”协同创新工程（XTCXGC2021019-ZYS02）

Screening, Identification, Biological Characteristics of Yeast Strains and Their Antifungal Activities against Botrytis cinerea

LAI Chengchun¹, LAI Gongti¹, CHEN Bingxing², Pan Ruo¹, Que Qiuxia¹, CHE Jianmei²

1. Institute of Agricultural Engineering Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China;
2. Institute of Agricultural Bio-Resources Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China

Received:2022-09-20 Online:2023-06-08 Published:2023-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以葡萄灰霉病菌Botrytis cinerea为靶标菌，筛选获得2株拮抗酵母菌G17515和G31887，经形态学和分子生物学方法分别鉴定为Starmerella bacillaris和Meyerozyma caribbica（卡利比克迈耶氏酵母）。菌株G17515和G31887的培养温度为20 ℃～30 ℃（最佳培养温度为30 ℃），pH值为pH 5.0～7.0（最佳pH 6.0），NaCl浓度为0.1%～5%（最佳NaCl浓度为0.1%）。酵母菌G17515和G31887发酵液可以明显抑制葡萄灰霉病菌丝的生长，其抑制率分别为80.86%和69.05%，并且导致菌丝和孢子形态发生异常。离体接种试验结果表明，这2株酵母菌可显著抑制葡萄灰霉病菌斑的扩展，对葡萄叶片灰霉病抑制率分别为64.21%和57.22%，对果实灰霉病的生防效果分别为48.56%和77.13%。综上所述，S. bacillaris G17515和M. caribbica G31887对葡萄灰霉病具有显著的抑制效果，有望作为防治葡萄灰霉病的菌株资源。

关键词: 葡萄灰霉病, 酵母菌, 生物学特性, 菌丝, 拮抗

Abstract: Two antagonistic strains G17515 and G31887 were screened out, which showed good biocontrol activities against Botrytis cinerea. The two yeast strains were identified as Starmerella bacillaris and Meyerozyma caribbica by morphological observation and phylogenetic tree analysis. The cultural conditions of G17515 and G31887 were as follows: 20 ℃—30 ℃ (optimum 30 ℃), pH 5—7 (optimum pH 6.0) and 0.1%—5% NaCl (optimum 0.1%). The results of in vitro culture showed that two antagonistic strains G17515 and G31887 could significantly inhibit the mycelial growth of B. cinerea, which inhibit rates were 80.86% and 69.05%, respectively. And the two strains also caused abnormalities in mycelium and spore morphology of B. cinerea. Furthermore, G17515 and G31887 could inhibit the expansion of B. cinerea on grape leaves and fruits. Their inhibitory efficiency on grape leaves reached 64.21% and 57.22%, respectively. And their biocontrol efficiency on grape fruits were 48.56% and 77.13%, respectively. In conclusion, S. bacillaris G17515 and M. caribbica G31887 showed inhibitory effects on B. cinerea, which is expected to be a strain resource for controlling gray mold disease on grapes.

Key words: Botrytis cinerea, yeast, biological characteristic, mycelium, antagonism

中图分类号:

S476

赖呈纯, 赖恭梯, 陈冰星, 潘若, 阙秋霞, 车建美. 拮抗酵母菌的筛选鉴定、生物学特性及其对葡萄灰霉病菌的抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 594-606.

LAI Chengchun, LAI Gongti, CHEN Bingxing, Pan Ruo, Que Qiuxia, CHE Jianmei. Screening, Identification, Biological Characteristics of Yeast Strains and Their Antifungal Activities against Botrytis cinerea[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2023, 39(3): 594-606.

参考文献

[1] 张威, 周勇, 彭言劼, 等. 葡萄灰霉病病原菌鉴定及天然药物的抑制效果评价[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2021, (4):26-32.
[2] 高全, 吴雅林, 胡平, 等. 草果挥发油化学成分及对葡萄灰霉病菌的抑菌活性[J]. 2022, 农药, 61(5):378-385.
[3] Zhang H Y, Godana E A, Sui Y, et al. Biological control as an alternative to synthetic fungicides for the management of grey and blue mould diseases of table grapes:a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 2020, 46(4):1-13.
[4] 付莉媛, 蔡瑞杰, 冯志敏, 等. 葡萄灰霉病生防芽胞杆菌的筛选与防效评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(2):440-446.
[5] Sabrina R, Weber R W S, Daniel R, et al. Spread of Botrytis cinerea strains with multiple fungicide resistance in German horticulture[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2016, 7:2075.
[6] 田秀, 周连柱, 黄晓庆, 等. 我国葡萄灰霉病菌对四霉素和啶酰菌胺的敏感性测定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(4):868-873.
[7] Sun C X, Zhu C X, Tang Y, et al. Inhibition of Botrytis cinerea and control of gray mold on table grapes by calcium propionate[J]. Food Quality and Safety, 2021, 5:16.
[8] Jeong D K, Ji E K, Beom S K. Postharvest disease control efficacy of the polyene macrolide lucensomycin produced by Streptomyces plumbeus strain CA5 against gray mold on grapes[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 162:111115.
[9] 王红丽, 善文辉, 胡海瑶, 等. 生防菌混合接种对葡萄灰霉病菌的防治效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):265-271.
[10] 潘虹余, 金玮鋆, 张晓蒙, 等. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌B15抑菌物质对葡萄灰霉病灰葡萄孢的抑菌机理[J]. 微生物学报, 2018, 58(07):1245-1254.
[11] Rotolo C, Marm D, Dongiovanni C, et al. Use of biocontrol angents and botanicals in integrated management of Botrytis cinerea in table grape vineyards[J]. Pest Management Science, 2018, 74(3):715-725.
[12] 文建斌, 沈文武, 詹红艳, 等. 4种生物农药对葡萄灰霉病的田间防效[J]. 云南农业科技, 2022(2):39-41.
[13] 赵海霞, 马岩涛, 李涛. 红提葡萄灰霉病病原菌分离及拮抗真菌的筛选鉴定[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(2):45-48.
[14] 王笑笑, 季小诗, 刘芳, 等. 生防菌KD-16J的鉴定及其对番茄灰霉病的抑制作用[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(3):182-188.
[15] Maluleke E, Jolly N P, Patterton H G, et al. Antifungal activity of non-conventional yeasts against Botrytis cinerea and non-Botrytis grape bunch rot fungi[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13:986229.
[16] Marsico A D, Velenosi M, Perniola R, et al. Non-saccharomyces yeasts used for biological control of Botrytis cinerea in stored table grape[J]. Microorganisms, 2021, 9(2):457.
[17] 曹琬迪."阳光玫瑰"葡萄产业发展现状与对策分析[J]. 热带农业科学, 2023, 43(5):126-131.
[18] 耿鹏, 张彦博, 胡美英, 等. 柑橘采后绿霉病生防酵母菌的筛选、鉴定及其生防效果研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(6):191-196.
[19] 赖呈纯, 赖恭梯, 车建美, 等. 福建地区葡萄自然发酵过程中酵母菌的组成及差异分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(6):1655-1664.
[20] 窦国霞, 蒋春号, 郭虹娜, 等. 葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母对采后草莓灰霉病抗性诱导机理研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(7):1290-1302.
[21] Tomas R G, Bernardo M A, Juan R P J, et al. Debaryomyces hansenii, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila, and Ulvan as biocontrol agents of fruit rot disease in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.)[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(2):184.
[22] Zou X R, Wei Y Y, Jiang S, et al. Volatile organic compounds and rapid proliferation of Candida pseudolambica W16 are modes of action against gray mold in peach fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2022, 186:111751.
[23] Wojciench J J, Lise K. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2002, 40:411-441.
[24] Fravel D R. Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2005, 43:337-359.
[25] Wojciench J J, Robert A S, William S C, et al. Control of blue mold decay of apple during commercial controlled atmosphere storage with yeast antagonists and sodium bicarbonate[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 49(3):374-378.
[26] 戴忠良, 高克祥. 生防酵母菌株的分离筛选及其防治苹果果实轮纹病效果[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(9):102-108, 138.
[27] Yang Q, Wang H, Zhang H, et al. Effect of Yarrowla lipolytica on postharvest decay of grapes caused by Talaromyces rugulosus and the protein expression profile of T. rugulosus[J]. Posharvest Biology and Technology, 2017, 126:15-22.
[28] 喻最新, 贺明阳, 王日葵, 等. 利用拮抗酵母防治水果采后病害的研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(3):358-366.
[29] 任亚峰, 韦唯, 李冬雪, 等. 葡萄灰霉病病原菌鉴定及生物学特性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(5):1139-1144.
[30] Guetsky R, Shtienberg D, Elad Y, et al. Improving biological control by combining biocontrol agents each with several mechanisms of disease suppression[J]. Phytopathology, 2002, 92(9):976-985.
[31] Saravanakumar D, Ciavorella A, Spadaro D, et al. Metchnikowia pulcherrima strain MACH1 outcompetes Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata and Panicillium expansum in apples through iron depletion[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 49(1):121-128.
[32] 罗琳, 周泠璇, 刘娅. 毕赤酵母G5拮抗葡萄灰霉病机理初探[J]. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(9):210-215.
[33] Karabulut O A, Tezcan H, Daus A, et al. Control of preharvest and postharvest gruit rot in strawberry by Metschnikowia fructicola[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2004, 14(14):513-521.
[34] 耿鹏, 杨柳, 郝卫宁, 等. 拮抗酵母菌控制果蔬采后病害的研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(20):220-225.

拮抗酵母菌的筛选鉴定、生物学特性及其对葡萄灰霉病菌的抑菌活性研究

Screening, Identification, Biological Characteristics of Yeast Strains and Their Antifungal Activities against Botrytis cinerea

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

联系我们

[1]	赵云福, 乔淑芹, 王海燕, 许海军, 赵利华, 武海斌, 孙志强, 王佳宁, 梁晨. 苹果主要真菌病害广谱拮抗木霉菌的筛选鉴定及田间防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 567-574.
[2]	党柯柯, 彭俊伟, 孙阳, 谢子煜, 董元华, 李建刚. 拮抗姜瘟病内生细菌的筛选及其生防效果研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 585-593.
[3]	李文巧, 王娇, 刘晓宁, 李亚宁, 何运转, 刘大群. 白术疫霉拮抗链霉菌的筛选、鉴定及其抑菌效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 636-645.
[4]	张玉丹, 谭琳, 任佐华, 杨艺帅, 杨学宇, 胡秋龙. 茶炭疽病拮抗链霉菌的筛选鉴定与拮抗能力测定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 646-656.
[5]	章舸, 彭玉龙, 芶剑渝, 何楷, 李章海, 汪章勋, 齐永霞. 烟草疫霉拮抗放线菌的生防潜力评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 667-675.
[6]	唐良德, 臧连生. 六斑月瓢虫生物生态学及其生物防治研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3): 697-709.
[7]	蔡悦, 唐小飞, 胡婷, 葛春梅, 阮班锋. 一株合欢枯萎病拮抗菌的分离鉴定及盆栽防治试验[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(2): 397-406.
[8]	王小武, 蒋旭东, 丁新华, 袁梓涵, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超. 新疆荒漠绿洲区亚洲玉米螟越冬幼虫4种主要病原真菌生物学特性及致病力测定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(2): 305-312.
[9]	赵新贝, 赵辉, 倪云霞, 刘新涛, 何碧珀, 贾敏, 张春艳, 李永冬, 赵世魁, 刘红彦. 拜赖青霉菌株47M-1的培养条件优化及其对芝麻枯萎病的防治效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(1): 167-175.
[10]	兰成忠, 甘林, 代玉立, 刘晓菲, 杨秀娟, 蒋军喜. 黄瓜枯萎病菌拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定和防效测定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(1): 184-193.
[11]	褚晋, 闫晗, 韩涛, 徐晗, 杨皓, 缪建锟, 白元俊, 董海, 李志强. 沼液对稻瘟病的防治效果及内生拮抗细菌筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1516-1525.
[12]	李佳昕, 蔡晨亮, 王琰, 张茹琴, 王志奎, 鄢洪海. 棘孢木霉菌鉴定及其对花生白绢病生防机制的研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1534-1544.
[13]	刘天波, 赵誉强, 滕凯, 周向平, 肖艳松, 蔡海林, 肖志鹏, 陈武, 唐前君. 烟草疫霉拮抗细菌B44R-1的筛选及其生防效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1545-1552.
[14]	吕天宇, 贺旭, 罗明, 韩剑, 包慧芳, 黄伟. 梨火疫病菌拮抗细菌FX1培养基及摇瓶发酵条件优化[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1553-1565.
[15]	肖志鹏, 李玲玲, 母婷婷, 单雪华, 陆峰, 唐前君, 刘天波. 烟草赤星病菌拮抗菌解淀粉芽胞杆菌YW-2-6鉴定及生防效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(6): 1598-1607.