Optimization Trapping Technology for Controlling Odontothrips loti (Haliday) (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in Alfalfa Field

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2023.01.010

Abstract

Abstract: The efficiency of sticky traps for trapping Odontothrips loti (Haliday) in alfalfa fields was investigated with respect to color, hanging height, location in fields, and daily timing in 2021 and 2022. The results showed that the white sticky board trapped the most O. loti, with trap catches of 293.1 and 219.0 insects/board in 2021 and 2022, respectively, and a minimal impact on natural enemies as indicated by the beneficial to pest ratio of 0.05 in the catch. The white boards hanged at 50 cm high trapped significantly more O. loti than those at 20 cm. The sticky boards set at the edge of the alfalfa fields showed higher efficiency than those at the central section. The number of O. loti trapped at dusk was more than that in other times. Annually, trap catches of O. loti peaked from the end of June to the middle of July when Medicago sativa was in the second growth period, averaging 454.6 insects/board; when the damage peaked around July 13, the average trap catches were 623.5 insects/board. When the crop was in the budding stage inf each season, O. loti caused the highest damage. The trapping using color boards offers a green control system of O. loti.

Key words: Odontothrips loti, colored sticky boards, Medicago sativa, trapping effects, green management

CLC Number:

S476

QIAO Lang, ZHANG Zhiqiang, BAN Liping, NI Peng, HAN Haibin, TAN Yao. Optimization Trapping Technology for Controlling Odontothrips loti (Haliday) (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in Alfalfa Field[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2023, 39(6): 1351-1360.

References

[1] 谭瑶, 王春媛, 孟超, 等. 内蒙古地区紫花苜蓿半翅目昆虫群落结构与多样性[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(6): 24-28.
[2] 岳彦红, 齐晓, 王彦荣, 等. 35个10龄紫花苜蓿品种的持久性比较[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 58-64.
[3] May W, Soroka J, Loeppky H A, et al. The effects of trichlorfon and deltamethrin on alfalfa plant bug and lygus bug (Heteroptera: Miridae) populations in alfalfa grown in Canada[J]. Crop Protection, 2003, 22(6): 883-889.
[4] 马明. 紫花苜蓿的利用及畜禽饲喂效果[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2021, 17(6): 74-75.
[5] 张晓燕, 彭然, 胡桂馨. 牛角花齿蓟马若虫持续危害对苜蓿生长的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2017, 37(4): 8-13.
[6] 张蓉, 杨芳, 先晨钟, 等. 蓟马危害苜蓿的产量损失及防治指标研究[J]. 植物保护, 2005(1): 47-49.
[7] 潘新龙, 孔宝华, 李云国, 等. 云南苹果产区蓟马种类调查[J]. 中国南方果树, 2021, 50(2): 151-153.
[8] Mahsa H, Kambiz M. A new species of Odontothrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Fars province, Iran[J]. Zootaxa, 2019, 4674(1): 1-9.
[9] Mirab-balou M, Tong X L, Wang J, et al. A new Odontothrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) from Iran[J]. Zootaxa, 2013, 3736(5): 598-600.
[10] 李楠, 马晓霞, 王新谱. 苜蓿重要害虫牛角花齿蓟马研究进展[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019, 39(11): 31-35.
[11] 李亚姝, 温雅洁, 周生英, 等. 施钾对苜蓿上牛角花齿蓟马产卵选择、生长发育、成虫寿命和繁殖力的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2021, 64(6): 694-702.
[12] Luo L, Jiang H, Yuan Z L. Toxicity and field efficacy of six insecticides on alfalfa thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)[J]. Agricultural Biotechnology, 2021, 10(2): 75-77.
[13] 陈佳杰, 甄云, 孙秀华, 等. 5种药剂防治牛角花齿蓟马效果初步研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(5): 79-81.
[14] 郭祖国, 王梦馨, 崔林, 等. 昆虫趋色性及诱虫色板的研究和应用进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10): 3615-3626.
[15] Makoto U, Junya F, Musashi S, et al. Controllable positive/negative phototaxis of millimeter-sized objects with sensing function[J]. Langmuir, 2021, DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01833.
[16] 安静杰, 高占林, 党志红, 等. 棉蚜有翅成蚜对不同波段光谱的选择性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1441-1446.
[17] 刘军和, 赵紫华. 昆虫视觉在寄主寻找及定位过程中的作用[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(3): 353-362.
[18] 王琛, 朱文静, 符悦冠, 等. 茶黄蓟马嗜好颜色筛选及监测效果测定[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(1): 107-115.
[19] 唐良德, 韩云, 吴建辉, 等. 豆大蓟马室内对不同颜色及光波的趋性反应[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6): 169-172.
[20] 陈俊谕, 牛黎明, 李磊, 等. 不同颜色粘虫板对花蓟马的田间诱集效果[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2017, 39(5): 1169-1176.
[21] 夏红军, 李建宇, 史梦竹, 等. 不同颜色诱虫板对芒果园蓟马的田间诱集效果[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(7): 818-823.
[22] 刘阳, 姜洪, 袁忠林, 等. 粘虫板对苜蓿田牛角花齿蓟马的诱集效果[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(7): 83-86.
[23] 桑文, 高俏, 张长禹, 等. 我国农业害虫物理防治研究与应用进展[J]. 植物保护学报, 2022, 49(1): 173-183.
[24] 贾娜, 刘靖, 卢威成, 等. 不同颜色粘虫板对葡萄园昆虫的诱集效应[J]. 中国果树, 2021(2): 31-35.
[25] 吴霜, 张谊模, 刘玉英, 等. 6种颜色粘虫板对春季菜地昆虫的诱集效应[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 3: 1-9.
[26] 胡桂馨, 彭然, 景康康, 等. 牛角花齿蓟马为害对苜蓿无性系根茎叶及同化产物分配的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9): 2967-2974.
[27] 邬劼, 周会云, 王冲. 黄、蓝色板田间不同布置方法对草莓蚜虫、蓟马诱虫量的影响[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(11): 27-28.
[28] Park Y G, Lee J H. Life history characteristics of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), under fluctuating conditions of temperature or relative humidity[J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2020, DOI:10.1016/j.aspen.2020.04.010.
[29] 吴永敷, 李秀娴, 赵秀华. 危害苜蓿的蓟马生活史及活动规律的初步研究[J]. 中国草地, 1990(4): 38-41.
[30] 吴永敷, 特木尔布和, 赵秀华. 苜蓿蓟马的研究[J]. 草地学报, 1991(1): 119-125.
[31] Cao Y, Yang H, Li J, et al. Population development of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips hawaiiensis in constant and fluctuating temperatures[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2019, 143: 49-57.
[32] 王丽学, 吴洪新, 霍文娟, 等. 紫花苜蓿营养品质与气象因子的关系研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(6): 14-20.
[33] Bana J K, Ghoghari P D, Stjshil K, et al. Population dynamics of mango thrips and its natural enemies[J]. Indian Journal of Entomology, 2021, 83(2): 202-206.
[34] 李晓维, 章金明, 张治军, 等. 蓟马信息素研究及应用进展[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(6): 1163-1173.