Ecological Management of Main Soil-Borne Diseases of Tomato and Cucumber in the Greenhouse in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2024.02.038

Abstract

Abstract: To solve the serious occurrence of soil borne diseases and the obstacles widely occurred in continuous vegetable cultivation in Ningxia, two sets of ecological management technology were integrated and demonstrated in Yongning county, Yinchuan city and Touying town, Guyuan city of Ningxia, respectively. In this study, two systems, namely technical system (soil fumigation in conjunction with microbial agents/fertilizers) and farmer system (conventional chemical pesticides and fertilizer management), were applied in the greenhouse of tomato and cucumber, respectively. The results showed that under the technical system, the height and stem diameter of tomato increased by 7.96% and 25.13%, respectively, while cucumber increased by 24.47% and 5.32%, respectively, in comparison with the farmer system. Under the technical system, the incidence of tomato root rot was only 1.11%, the control efficacy was 80.70%, and the disease index of cucumber root knot nematode was 5.20, the control efficacy reached as high as 88.00%. Under the technical system, the average yield of tomato increased by 28.49%, and that of cucumber increased by 58.37%. The tomato profit increased by 140.38% in the technology-system, compared to farmer-system, while the cucumber profit increased by 100.29%. Under the technology-sytem, the application of chemical pesticides and chemical fertilizers on tomato was reduced by 6 times and 6 times, respectively, while their application on cucumber was reduced by 17 times and 16 times, respectively. In summary, the ecological management technology proposed in this study could promote the plant growth and development, improve the quality and yield of tomato and cucumber in the greenhouse, and showed good control efficacy on the control of soil-borne diseases. It can achieve the goal of saving costs and increasing the efficiency of vegetables production in greenhouse.

Key words: soil-borne disease, ecological management, technology integration, economic benefit, greenhouse vegetable

CLC Number:

S476

GUO Chengjin, YANG Bo, WANG Xigang, SHEN Ruiqing, ZHANG Lirong, LI Shidong, GUO Rongjun. Ecological Management of Main Soil-Borne Diseases of Tomato and Cucumber in the Greenhouse in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2024, 40(5): 1120-1127.

References

[1] 张青, 杨宁权. 宁夏蔬菜种植结构调查与对策研究[J]. 南方农机, 2022, 53(18): 73-75.
[2] 郭文忠, 李思, 弓瑶, 等. 乡村振兴背景下宁夏蔬菜产业发展的科技需求与建议[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2022, 63(1): 60-63.
[3] 郭文忠. 西北旱作区蔬菜有机化生产系统构建与探索[M]. 北京, 中国农业大学出版社, 2019, 11-12.
[4] 杨冬艳, 赵云霞, 王丹, 等. 宁夏日光温室蔬菜机械化生产实践及效果[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2021(10): 117-121.
[5] 吴圣勇, 张梦迪, 徐进, 等. 我国设施园艺病虫害发生特点与绿色防控策略[J/OL]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x. 2022.01.022.
[6] 刘静婉, 李琼, 张涛, 等. 从改良土壤角度探索人参连作障碍解决方法的研究进展[J]. 应用化学, 2022, 39(12): 1818-1832.
[7] 曹云, 宋修超, 郭德杰, 等. 棉隆熏蒸与微生物有机肥联用对西瓜枯萎病的防控研究[J]. 土壤, 2018, 50(1): 93-100.
[8] 王红燕, 陈垣, 郭凤霞, 等. 棉隆土壤熏蒸对党参育苗品质和产量的效应[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2021, 27(24): 138-147.
[9] 康萍芝, 田生虎, 吴晓燕, 等. 棉隆土壤熏蒸对设施黄瓜枯萎病的田间防效评价[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2020, 61(9): 16-19.
[10] 聂海珍, 孙漫红, 李世东, 等. 棉隆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治番茄根结线虫病的效果评价[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(4): 689-696.
[11] 方文生, 曹坳程, 韩大伟, 等. 两种熏蒸剂对土传病害的防控效果及黄瓜产量的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016(7): 44-48.
[12] 高晓静, 张丽霞, 王琦, 等. 微生态制剂对内蒙古番茄根结线虫病作用效果的研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(10): 2464-2467.
[13] 王广印, 郭卫丽, 陈碧华, 等. 棉隆及与生物菌肥配施对大棚秋番茄生长、产量及病虫草害的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(2):48-52.
[14] 张洁, 夏明聪, 刘红彦, 等. 低剂量棉隆熏蒸联合生物菌肥防治黄瓜根结线虫病的应用效果[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(4): 824-831.
[15] 郭成瑾, 陈杭, 王喜刚, 等. 育苗基质添加复配微生物菌剂对番茄生长及根腐病发生的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(16): 52-57.
[16] 刘伟中, 王宏宝, 毛佳, 等. 黄瓜根结线虫病病情指数分级方法研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(9): 887-890.
[17] 周犇. 木霉生物有机肥对设施蔬菜连作障碍的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2021.
[18] 乔蓬蕾, 吴凤芝, 周新刚. 连作对作物根际土壤微生物菌群及酶活性影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2013, 44(5): 524-530.
[19] Xiong W, Zhao QY, Zhao J, et al. Different continuous cropping spans significantly affect microbial community membership and structure in a vanilla-grown soil as revealed by deep pyrosequencing[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2015, 70(1): 209-218.
[20] 王进明, 董孔军. 土壤熏蒸、微生物菌剂及不同肥料配施对温室辣椒连作障碍的治理效果[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2022(8): 85-91.
[21] 王艳霞, 冯宏, 李华兴, 等. 生物复混肥对土壤微生物的影响研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008(6): 1206-1211.
[22] 米国全, 王裔娜, 史艳艳, 等. 土壤熏蒸剂及生物菌肥对日光温室番茄土壤酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(7): 100-105.
[23] Yan D D, Wang Q, Li Y, et al. Analysis of the inhibitory effects of chloropicrin fumigation on nitrification in various soil types [J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 175: 459-464.
[24] 唐志敏, 徐严, 骆夏辉, 等. 不同用量氰氨化钙对草莓根际微生物及品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(7): 33-37.
[25] 胡洪涛, 朱志刚, 焦忠久, 等. 棉隆土壤消毒对高山甘蓝根肿病土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(16): 120-127.
[26] 黄石旺, 王锡春, 周雨, 等. 土壤熏蒸对烟草土传病害的防控效果研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021, (11): 59-61, 65.
[27] 宋雨萌, 陈昊晗, 王敏, 等. 土壤熏蒸剂对大白菜根肿病的防效和土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2022(10): 81-85.
[28] 田甜, 孙漫红, 李世东. 棉隆与粉红螺旋聚孢霉67-1协同防治黄瓜枯萎病的研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2014, 30(4): 503-510.
[29] 王艳平, 李萍, 王维瑞, 等. 土壤消毒对温室土传病害和连作茶菊的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(21): 83-87.
[30] 宋雪菲, 尉京红. 基于物元模型的农业技术集成与示范类项目社会效益评价方法研究-以“河北省小麦-玉米节水丰产增效技术集成与示范项目” 为例[J]. 河北农业科学, 2020, 24(6): 91-95.
[31] 邱国梁, 姜昊, 任庆棉, 等. 中国农业科学院绿色发展技术集成模式的探讨与实践[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(9): 1496-1499, 1503.
[32] 杨柳, 周清华, 王东歧, 等. 土壤熏蒸与水肥菌/药一体化技术联用防控设施番茄病害[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(4): 890-895.