Screening and Identification of Active Components of Rice Volatiles with Functional Effects on Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2023.01.032

Abstract

Abstract: The difference of chemical components of rice volatiles released by the resistant variety Mudgo and the susceptible variety TN1 was assessed in relation to their functional effects on the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). Volatiles were obtained by headspace dynamic collection, and the active components of rice volatiles were screened and identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The functions of the differentially active volatiles of Mudgo and TN1 rice were verified by Y-type. As a result, a total of 52 volatile chemicals were identified in the volatiles of the two rice varieties, among which 27 chemicals were identified in both Mudgo and TN1, 10 chemicals were present only in Mudgo and 15 chemicals were present only in TN1. Further, 11 volatile chemicals were screened for functional verification. The Y-type results showed that linalool at low concentration (2 mL/mL), β-sesquahydralene at high concentration (200 mL/mL), and methyl salicylate had significant repellent effects on the brown planthopper. D-limonene, β-caryophyllene, 2-heptanone at high concentration, 2-ethyl-benzenamine, and 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-pentadecane showed significant attractant effects on the brown planthopper. The results of this study are of significance for the development of repellents or attractants for the green control and integrated pest management of the brown planthopper.

Key words: brown planthopper, rice volatiles, functional effects, screening and identification, selection response

CLC Number:

S476

WANG Xingyun, ZHANG Xinqiang, LI Jing, HUANG Xiaoling, ZHANG Yuanchen, ZHANG Kunpeng, WANG Jingshun. Screening and Identification of Active Components of Rice Volatiles with Functional Effects on Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2023, 39(6): 1474-1481.

References

[1] 程遐年, 吴进才, 马飞. 褐飞虱研究与防治[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003, 10-25.
[2] Chen M, Shelton A, Ye G Y. Insect-resistant genetically modified rice in China: from research to commercialization [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2011, 56: 81-101.
[3] Yoo J K, Lee S W, Ahn Y J, et al. Altered acetylcholinesterase as a resistance mechanism in the brown planthopper (Homoptera: Delphacidae), Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2002, 37(1): 37-41.
[4] 张献英, 霍治国, 犹昌艳, 等. 20种非寄主植物挥发物对褐飞虱拒避与引诱行为的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2014, 35(3): 63-68.
[5] 陈萍, 刘丹丹, 修小鉴, 等. 对草地贪夜蛾有嗅觉生理活性的玉米和水稻挥发物组分[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(3): 90-97, 110.
[6] Schuman M C, Baldwin I T. The layers of plant responses to insect herbivores[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2016, 61: 373-394.
[7] 杜家纬. 植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制[J]. 植物生理学报, 2001(3): 193-200.
[8] 戴建青, 韩诗畴, 杜家纬. 植物挥发性信息化学物质在昆虫寄主选择行为中的作用[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2010, 32(3): 407-414.
[9] 莫晓畅, 娄永根. 水稻害虫化学生态调控研究进展[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2016, 53(3): 435-445.
[10] Lou Y, Hu L, Li J. Herbivore-induced defenses in rice and their potential application in rice planthopper management[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015, 91-115.
[11] 徐涛, 周强, 夏嫱, 等. 虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱寄主选择行为的影响[J]. 科学通报, 2002, 47(11): 849-853.
[12] Xiao Y, Wang Q, Erb M, et al. Specific herbivore-induced volatiles defend plants and determine insect community composition in the field[J]. Ecology Letters, 2012, 15(10): 1130-1139.
[13] 汪鹏. 调控褐飞虱及其天敌稻虱缨小蜂行为的活性化合物筛选及其田间效果的初步测定[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011.
[14] 卢海燕. 稻田常用农药对水稻挥发物释放的影响及其生态效应[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2010.
[15] Jiao Y, Hu X, Peng Y, et al. Bt rice plants may protect neighbouring non Bt rice plants against the striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2018, 285(1883): 20181283.
[16] 周强, 徐涛, 张古忍, 等. 虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱的驱避作用[J]. 昆虫学报, 2003, 46(6): 739-744.
[17] Baldwin I T. Plant volatiles[J]. Current Biology, 2010, 20(9): 392-397.
[18] 杨朗, 黄凤宽, 曾玲, 等. 水稻挥发性次生物质对褐飞虱寄主定向及生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 5106-5114.
[19] 胡国文, 梁天锡, 刘光杰, 等. 抗白背飞虱水稻品种挥发性次生物质的提取、组分鉴定与生测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1994(4): 223-230.
[20] Obata T, Koh H S, Kim M, et al. Constituents of planthopper attractant in rice plant[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 1983, 18(2): 161-169.
[21] 肖榕, 曹营帅, 武韩, 等. 从虫害诱导水稻挥发物中筛选对拟环纹豹蛛有引诱活性的化合物[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(5): 1021-1027.
[22] Hu X, Su S, Liu Q, et al. Caterpillar-induced rice volatiles provide enemy-free space for the offspring of the brown planthopper[J]. eLife, 2020, 9: e55421.
[23] James D G. Further field evaluation of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31(3): 481-495.
[24] De Boer J G, Dicke M. The role of methyl salicylate in prey searching behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2004, 30(2): 255-271.
[25] Zhu J, Park K C. Methyl salicylate, a soybean aphid-induced plant volatile attractive to the predator Coccinella septempunctata[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31(8): 1733-1746.
[26] James D G, Price T S. Field-testing of methyl salicylate for recruitment and retention of beneficial insects in grapes and hops[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2004, 30(8): 1613-1628.
[27] Yuan J S, Köllner T G, Wiggins G, et al. Molecular and genomic basis of volatile-mediated indirect defense against insects in rice[J]. The Plant Journal, 2008, 55(3): 491-503.
[28] 吕静. 水稻抗虫相关基因OsERF3及OsACS2 的功能解析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011.
[29] 刘晓丽, 娄永根. 褐飞虱与白背飞虱为害诱导水稻防御反应的比较[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(5): 971-978.
[30] 涂蓉. 桔小实蝇及其幼虫寄生蜂的嗅觉行为研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2012.
[31] 戈林泉. 水稻β-石竹烯和柠檬烯基因的克隆鉴定、原核表达及其遗传转化[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2008.
[32] Cheng A X, Xiang C Y, Li J X, et al. The rice (E)-β-caryophyllene synthase (OsTPS3) accounts for the major inducible volatile sesquiterpenes[J]. Phytochemistry, 2007, 68(12): 1632-1641.
[31] 张宇皓. 水稻挥发物对二化螟及稻田寄生蜂的引诱效果研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.