Identification of Active Substances of Bacillus atrophaeus LB6-2 to Inhibit Rhizoctonia solani

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2024.02.013

Abstract

Abstract: Bacteria LB6-2 was selected against Rhizoctonia solani by plate face-off method,mycelium growth rate method and sclerotium germination inhibition method.It showed the inhibition rate of mycelium growth and sclerotium germination of strain LB6-2 was 71.76% and 100.00%.The strain was identified Bacillus atrophaeus(OK639005.1) by observing morphological characteristics,analyzing physicochemical properties and 16S rDNA amplification.The fermentation products were extracted by macroporous resin method and prepared by HPLC.Fourteen active components were determined by activity determination,and the single compounds were prepared and analyzed by HPLC-MS,NMR and activity determination.The compounds LBN4-2,LBN4-4 and LBN4-5 were identified as Cyclo (Pro-Val),Cyclo (D-Leu-L-Pro) and Cyclo (L-prolyl-D-phenylalanyl),respectively.The activity assay of the three compounds showed that the inhibition rates of hyphal growth were 86.16%,84.87% and 83.10% at concentration was 4 mmol/L,respectively.While the concentration of the three compounds were above 2 mmol/L,the inhibition rates of hyphal germination were 100%.In summary,Bacillus atrophaeus LB6-2 has the potential to be used as a biocontrol agent against Rhizoctonia solani.

Key words: Rhizoctonia solani, Bacillus atrophaeus, active substance, structure identification

CLC Number:

S476

LUO Wenfang, ZHOU Junhui, HE Wei, XU Jianjun. Identification of Active Substances of Bacillus atrophaeus LB6-2 to Inhibit Rhizoctonia solani[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2024, 40(2): 378-387.

References

[1] Atayi-Oyetunde O O, Bradley C A. Rhizoctonia solani:taxonomy, population biology and management of rhizoctonia seedling disease of soybean[J]. Plant Pathology, 2018, 67(1):3-17.
[2] Heydari A, Misaghi I J. The role of rhizosphere bacteria in herbicide-mediated increase in Rhizoctonia solani induced cotton seedling damping-off[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 257(2):391-396.
[3] Anderson N A. The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1982, 20(1):329-347.
[4] Vidhyasekaran P, Ruby ponmalar T, Samiyappan R, et al. Host-specific toxin production by Rhizoctonia solani, the rice sheath blight pathogen[J]. Phytopathology, 1997, 87(12):1258-1263.
[5] 杨雪,谢永丽,陈兰,等.青海极端生境7株萎缩芽孢杆菌的生物活性[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 49(4):459-466.
[6] 孙崇思,陈晓敏,束长龙,等.对大丽轮枝菌具有拮抗作用的萎缩芽胞杆菌的分离和鉴定[J].植物保护, 2014, 40(1):30-37.
[7] 薛鹏琦,刘芳,乔俊卿,等.油菜菌核病生防芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及其脂肽化合物分析[J].植物保护学报, 2011, 38(2):127-132.
[8] 李春,武占省,樊艳爽,等.一株萎缩芽孢杆菌株DPPG-28及其在作物病害防治方面的应用:CN201410461213.4[P]. 2015.04.22.
[9] Chen L, Zhang H, Zhao S F, et al. Lipopeptide production by Bacillus atrophaeus strain B44 and its biocontrol efficacy against cotton rhizoctoniosis[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2021, 43:1183-1193.
[10] 陈帅康,肖木,迪丽努尔,等.嗜果刀孢菌的室内药剂筛选及拮抗菌的种类鉴定[J].果树学报, 2023, 40(10):2229-2240.
[11] 罗文芳.水稻纹枯病生防菌的筛选与作用机制的初步研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[12] 布坎南R E,吉本斯N E.伯杰细菌鉴定手册[M].北京:科学出版社, 1984.
[13] Gamini S J, Maureen P T, Alan C L, et al. Metabolites from an antarctic sponge-associated bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Journal of Natural Products, 1996, 59(3):293-296.
[14] Valdivia L G, Pérez E T, López A C, et al. Identification and characterization of a new Bacillus atrophaeus strain B5 as biocontrol agent of postharvest anthracnose disease in soursop (Annona muricata) and avocado (Persea americana)[J]. Microbiological Research, 2018, 210:26-32.
[15] 朱杰,程亮,张纲,等.樱桃叶斑病生防菌株萎缩芽孢杆菌菌株QH-588的筛选鉴定[J].南方农业学报, 2021, 52(11):3022-3033.
[16] Veerubommu S, Himankshi T, Samriti G. Use of chitinolytic Bacillus atrophaeus strain S2BC-2 antagonistic to Fusarium spp. for control of rhizome rot of ginger[J]. Annals of Microbiology, 2013, 63(3):989-996.
[17] Dunlap C A, Bowman M J, Rooney A P. Iturinic lipopeptide diversity in the Bacillus subtilis species group important antifungals for plant disease biocontrol applications[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10:1794.
[18] Zhang X, Li B, Wang Y, et al. Lipopeptides, a novel protein, and volatile compounds contribute to the antifungal activity of the biocontrol agent Bacillus atrophaeus CAB-1[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97:9525-9534.
[19] 吕倩. 2株深海来源细菌的抗真菌活性代谢产物研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学, 2013.
[20] 刘邮洲,陈夕军,梁雪杰,等.一株萎缩芽胞杆菌YL3的鉴定及其脂肽类化合物分析[J].中国生物防治学报, 2017, 33(1):142-150.
[21] Ström K, Sjögren J, Broberg A, Schnürer J. Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo (L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo (L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002, 68(9):4322-4327.
[22] Jamal Q, Cho J Y, Moon J H, et al. Purification and antifungal characterization of Cyclo (D-Pro-L-Val) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Y1 against Fusarium graminearum to control head blight in wheat[J]. Biocatalysis Agricultural Biotechnology, 2017, 10:141-147.
[23] Cimmino A, Bejarano A, Masi M, et al. Isolation of 2,5-diketopiperazines from Lysobacter capsici AZ78 with activity against Rhodococcus fascians[J]. Natural Product Research, 2021, 35(23):4969-4977.