Functional Verification of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis WZ10 and Its Control Efficiency on Potato Fusarium Wilt

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2024.02.007

Abstract

Abstract: To clarify the biological function of Bacillus subtilis WZ10 and its indoor control efficiency on potato Fusarium wilt,growth promoting ability of strain WZ10 was tested by Salkowski's colorimetric and spectrophotometry methods and pot experiment.Biocontrol effect was determined by pot experiment and physiology and biochemistry measure,and phosphorus and kalium degradation abilities were tested by transparent zone method.The preventive effect of strain WZ10 was analyzed by laboratory test and physiological and biochemical determination.The results showed that WZ10 could produce IAA and degrade inorganic phosphorus,and showed significant control efficiency on potato Fusarium wilt.Compared to the control,the plant height,root length and fresh weight of plants were significantly increased by 14.34%,19.75% and 77.07%,respectively and the activities of PPO,POD,SOD and soluble protein amount of plants were significantly increased after strain WZ10 inoculation.Meanwhile,the control efficacy of strain WZ10 on potato Fusarium wilt was 80.65%,significantly higher than that of 30% metriaxalin treatment.In this study,strain WZ10 had strong growth promotion ability and significant control effect on potato Fusarium wilt,which will lay a foundation for the subsequent functional development and potato Fusarium wilt control.

Key words: Bacillus subtilis, potato Fusarium wilt, growth promotion, control efficiency

CLC Number:

S476

ZHAO Yuanzheng, ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Yan, XU Limin, ZHOU Hongyou, WANG Dong. Functional Verification of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis WZ10 and Its Control Efficiency on Potato Fusarium Wilt[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2024, 40(2): 370-377.

References

[1] Akosah Y, Lutfullin M T, Lutfullina G F, et al. The potato rhizoplane actively recruits Fusarium taxa from alfisols during flowering[J]. Rhizosphere, 2021,100449.
[2] 陈兰兰,邱慧珍,董爱菊,等.马铃薯根系分泌物及酚酸类物质对萎缩芽孢杆菌促生菌株QHZ3趋化成膜的介导作用[J].微生物学通报, 2021, 48(10):3642-3654.
[3] 张志良,和志豪,茹晓雅,等.未来气候变化对中国马铃薯种植气候适宜性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2023, 56(18):3530-3542.
[4] 王东,张妞,赵远征,等.内蒙古马铃薯主栽品种对腐烂茎线虫病的室内抗性评价[J].河南农业科学, 2021, 50(9):105-116.
[5] 贾瑞芳.马铃薯枯萎、黄萎病原菌的鉴定及复合侵染过程的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2022.
[6] Khedher S B, Mejdoub-Trabelsi B, Tounsi S. Biological potential of Bacillus subtilis V26 for the control of Fusarium wilt and tuber dry rot on potato caused by Fusarium species and the promotion of plant growth[J]. Biological Control, 2021, 152:104444.
[7] 贾瑞芳,康立茹,赵远征,等.内蒙古阴山沿麓马铃薯枯萎病病原菌的分离鉴定及其生物学特性[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2023, 49(1):65-75.
[8] 李彩虹,杨志辉,张岱,等.马铃薯枯萎病拮抗菌的筛选与鉴定[J].江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(13):92-95.
[9] 鹿秀云,赵卫松,白颖,等.利用微生物杀菌剂防治马铃薯黄萎病[J].中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):280-287.
[10] 陈童童,唐亚文,张思涵,等.大蒜内生菌对植物病害防治的研究进展[J].生物资源, 2023, 45(5):412-420.
[11] 曹鹏飞,吴华芬,陈银华.抗桃树细菌性穿孔病植物内生菌的筛选及其抑菌机制研究[J].江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(17):131-137.
[12] 董爱菊.类芽孢杆菌QHZ11对马铃薯黑痣病的生防机制及对马铃薯的促生效果研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大, 2021.
[13] 甘林,代玉立,刘晓菲,等.香蕉枯萎病高效拮抗土著细菌的筛选及其防效[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024(6):1-11.
[14] 李亚辉.具有拮抗作用的芽孢杆菌Q2H3的鉴定及其对马铃薯枯萎病生防效果的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2023.
[15] 戚家明,孙杉杉,张东旭,等.生防菌株PF-1基于全基因组数据的分类鉴定及拮抗能力分析[J].浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10):1816-1822.
[16] 姚晨虓,李小杰,李琦,等.烟草尖孢镰刀菌拮抗真菌的筛选鉴定及促生作用研究[J].中国生物防治学报, 2021, 37(5):1066-1072.
[17] 李铮,王金辉,丁丽丽,等.贝莱斯芽孢杆菌菌株NZ-4生防潜能及基因组学分析[J].江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(2):117-125.
[18] 黄雪珍,赵龙飞.药用植物内生菌对宿主植物促生作用机制研究进展[J].微生物学通报, 2023, 50(4):1653-1665.
[19] 王新叶,张敏,田小龙,等.糯高粱叶中IAA产生菌的分离筛选及其促植物生长作用[J].广西植物, 2003, DOI:10.1131931/guihaia.gxzw20230025.
[20] Cui L, Yang C, Wang Y, et al. Potential of an endophytic bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 3-5 as biocontrol agent against potato scab[J]. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2021, 163:105382.
[21] 陈多菲,徐畅,刘文佳,等. 3株水稻根际促生菌的筛选鉴定及促生作用研究[J].江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(24):196-202.
[22] 周锋,罗奥迪,韩奥辉,等. 8种植物源杀菌剂对假禾谷镰刀菌的抑菌活性及对小麦茎基腐病的防效探究[J].麦类作物学报, 2023, 43(12):1629-1635.
[23] 乔欣蕾,凡雪蕊,霍晓毅,等.枯草芽胞杆菌拮抗尖孢镰刀菌的抑菌物质分析[J].农业生物技术学报, 2021, 29(10):1999-2007.
[24] 何树文,王彦,崔凌霄,等.张掖市山丹县马铃薯枯萎病菌的鉴定[J].中国蔬菜, 2024(1):68-73.
[25] 赵远征,彭静文,侯伟峰,等.不同药剂对马铃薯枯萎病的田间防效分析[J].北方农业学报, 2022, 50(5):82-86.
[26] 张尹强.棘孢木霉PT-29与枯草芽孢杆菌S-16共培养对马铃薯主要土传病害的防治及其机理研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2023.
[27] 许帅,谢学文,张昀,等.马铃薯枯萎病生防芽胞杆菌筛选及生防效果研究[J].中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(5):761-770.
[28] Lastochkina O, Baymiev A, Shayahmetova A, et al. Effects of endophytic Bacillus Subtilis and salicylic acid on postharvest diseases (Phytophthora infestans, Fusarium oxysporum) development in stored potato tubers[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(1):2-22.
[29] 武建华,吕文霞,刘广晶,等.枯草芽孢杆菌对马铃薯黑痣病和黄萎病的防效及对土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国马铃薯, 2019, 33(2):101-109.
[30] 胡金雪,樊建英,相丛超,等.枯草芽孢杆菌对马铃薯的促生防病效应[J].中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(10):121-128.
[31] 慕英,魏固宁,李培贵,等.生防菌对马铃薯防病及促生作用研究进展[J].中国植保导刊, 2023, 43(6):19-25, 41.
[32] 冯玉衡.马铃薯黑痣病和枯萎病病菌拮抗菌株的筛选与鉴定[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
[33] Abdallah E F, Alqarawi A A, Hashem A, et al. Endophytic bacterium Bacillus subtilis(BERA 71) improves salt tolerance in chickpea plants by regulating the plant defense mechanisms[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2018, 13:37-44.
[34] 马雪晴,冀傲冉,郑娇莉,等.植物根际促生菌促生机制及其应用研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报, 2023, DOI:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0654.
[35] 谭海霞,李丽艳,王连龙,等.耐盐溶磷菌YJC19的鉴定及不同培养条件对其溶磷效果的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(9):235-239.