花生果腐病拮抗菌贝莱斯芽胞杆菌Hsg1949鉴定与防效

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.04.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 花生果腐病是由复合病原真菌引起的病害，直接严重影响花生的产量和品质。为筛选花生果腐病的生防微生物，以花生果腐病主要病原菌镰孢菌为靶标菌，采用稀释涂布平板法和平板对峙培养法，在花生根际土壤中筛选到一株对镰孢菌具有拮抗作用的生防细菌Hsg1949。经形态学观察、Biolog微生物自动鉴定系统及16S rDNA和gyrA序列构建系统发育树等综合分析，鉴定菌株Hsg1949为贝莱斯芽胞杆菌。菌株Hsg1949对3株镰孢菌分离株具有稳定的的拮抗活性，继代培养40代时，对3株镰孢菌的抑菌率分别为77.0%、69.7%和61.9%，与初始菌株F0代的抑菌活性无显著差异。其无菌上清液活性物质耐高温，耐强酸但不耐强碱，在pH 11的环境下拮抗活性显著降低。田间试验结果表明，Hsg1949菌悬液2×10⁸和5×10⁸cfu/mL可显著降低花生果腐病发病率，对花生果腐病的防治效果分别为66.54%和71.27%，与化学药剂多菌灵防效（75.11%）相当。菌株Hsg1949对花生白绢病菌、棉花立枯病菌、棉花枯萎病菌和棉花黄萎病菌也具有较强的拮抗作用，在植物真菌病害的生物防治中将具有较大的应用潜力。

关键词: 花生果腐病, 镰孢菌, 贝莱斯芽胞杆菌, 拮抗活性, 防效

Abstract: Pod rot caused by complex infections of a variety of pathogens leads to destructive losses of yield and quality of peanut. To obtain the biocontrol microorganism for controlling pod rot of peanut, an antagonistic bacterial strain Hsg1949 was screened from the rhizosphere soil of peanut by agar disk dilution and dual-culture assay using pathogenic fungi Fusarium spp. as indicators. Based on morphological characters, biolog identification system in combination with 16S rDNA and gyrA sequence analysis, the strain Hsg1949 was identified as Bacillus velezensis. After 40 generations of cultivation, Hsg1949 showed stable antifungal activity against three Fusarium spp. isolates, and the inhibition rates were 77.0%, 69.7 and 61.9%, respectively, without significant difference to the original generation. The cell-free supernatant also showed stable inhibitory effects against Fusarium spp. under high temperature and strong acid, however, the inhibitory activities decreased significantly when the pH value of supernatant was 11. Field trials showed that the biocontrol efficacies of Hsg1949 were 66.54% and 71.27% at concentrations of 2×10⁸ CFU/mL and 5×10⁸ CFU/mL, respectively, similar to that of carbendazim (75.11%). Also, the strain Hsg1949 exhibited antagonistic activity against four plant pathogenic fungi, including Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium dahliae. In summary, the strain Hsg1949 has excellent biocontrol characteristics and potential in biocontrol of plant diseases.

Key words: pod rot of peanut, Fusarium spp., Bacillus velezensis, antagonistic activity, biocontrol effect

中图分类号:

S476

曹伟平, 陆晴, 鹿秀云, 臧卫平, 宋健. 花生果腐病拮抗菌贝莱斯芽胞杆菌Hsg1949鉴定与防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2021, 37(4): 761-770.

CAO Weiping, LU Qing, LU Xiuyun, ZANG Weiping, SONG Jian. Identification of Antagonistic Bacterium Bacillus velezensis Hsg1949 and Its Biocontrol Effect on Peanut Pod Rot[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2021, 37(4): 761-770.

参考文献

[1] Mian W, Mingna C, Zhen Y, et al. Influence of peanut cultivars and environmental conditions on the diversity and community composition of pod rot soil fungi in China[J]. Mycobiology, 2017, 45:4, 392-400.
[2] 于静, 吴菊香, 许曼琳, 等. 防治花生腐霉果腐病的化学药剂筛选[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(1):121-126.
[3] 赵庆雷, 信彩云, 王瑜, 等. 不同轮作模式对花生病虫害及产量的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(6):1321-1327.
[4] 于静, 李莹, 许曼琳, 等. 不同花生品种对花生果腐病的抗性鉴定[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(4):681-686.
[5] Melouk H A, Backman P A. Peanut health management[M]. Minnesota St Paul, USA:American Phytopathological Sciety, 1995, 75-82.
[6] Sanogo S, Puppala N. Microorganisms associated with Valencia peanut affected by pod rot in New Mexico[J]. Peanut Science, 2012, 39:95-104.
[7] Arcury T A, Quandt S A. Pesticides at work and at home:exposure of migrant farmworkers[J]. The Lancet, 2003, 362:2021.
[8] Chaiharn M, Chunhaleuchanon S, Lumyong S. Screening siderophore producing bacteria as potential biological control agent for fungal rice pathogens in Thailand[J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 25(11):1919-1928.
[9] Fira D, Dimkić I, Berić T, et al. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2018, 285(10):44-55.
[10] 赵昱榕, 李磊, 谢学文, 等. 贝莱斯芽胞杆菌ZF2对多主棒孢病菌防治效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(2):217-225.
[11] 沙月霞, 隋书婷, 曾庆超, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌E69预防稻瘟病等多种真菌病害的潜力[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(11):1908-1917.
[12] 沙月霞, 曾庆超, 王昕, 等. 防治稻瘟病芽胞杆菌的筛选及效果评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(3):414-422.
[13] 谢梓语, 郭恩辉, 孙宇波, 等. 枯草芽胞杆菌B1409对番茄和辣椒的防病促生作用. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(3):520-527.
[14] 孙伟明, 时晨, 张梦涛, 等. 花生侵脉新赤壳菌果腐病生防芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及防病效果[J]. 微生物学报, 2018, 58(9):1573-1581.
[15] 张斌, 杨晓云, 陈志谊. 番茄枯萎病致病镰孢菌种类鉴定及优势种群的研究[J]. 植物病理学报, 2016, 46(4):561-565.
[16] 刘邮洲, 陈志谊, 梁雪杰, 等. 番茄枯萎病和青枯病拮抗细菌的筛选、评价与鉴定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2012, 28(1):101-108.
[17] 董汉松. 植病研究法[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2012, 57.
[18] 东秀珠, 蔡妙英. 常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2001.
[19] 李生樟, 陈颖, 杨瑞环, 等. 一株拮抗黄单胞菌的贝莱斯芽胞杆菌的分离和鉴定[J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(10):1969-1983.
[20] 邹秋霞,任佐华,高诗涵,等. 枯草芽胞杆菌YN145分离鉴定及抑菌活性[J], 中国生物防治学报, 2017, 33(3):421-426.
[21] 鹿秀云, 李宝庆, 张晓云, 等. 棉铃疫病生防细菌筛选、鉴定及制剂防治效果[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(4):805-815.
[22] 吴菊香, 陈殿绪, 刘同金, 等. 240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂不同施用方式对花生白绢病防效及产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(13):148-149,154.
[23] 史彩华, 胡静荣, 杨玉婷, 等. 不同药剂和施药方法对韭蛆的田间防治效果[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(2):282-289.
[24] 王小兵, 骆永明, 刘五星, 等. 花生青枯病内生拮抗细菌的鉴定、抗菌活性及其田间防效[J] 中国生物防治学报, 2011, 27(1):88-92.
[25] 郭鹤宝, 王星, 何山文, 等. 表型特征结合基因组分析鉴定不同菌落形态Bacillus velezensis ACCC 19742[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(2):142-148.
[26] 王传堂, 禹山林, 于洪涛, 等. 花生果腐病病原分子诊断[J]. 花生学报, 2010, 39(1):1-4.
[27] Hollowell J E, Shew B B, Beute M K. Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanut grown in North Carolina[J]. Plant Disease, 1998, 82(12):1345-1349.
[28] Yu J, Xu M, Liang C, et al. First report of Pythium myriotylum associated with peanut pod rot in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2019, 103(7):1794.
[29] Chi Y C, Xu M L, Yang J G, et al. First report of Rhizoc⁃tonia solani causing peanut pod rot in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2016, 100(5):1008.
[30] Bell D K, Sobers E K. A peg pod and root necrosis of peanuts caused by a species of Calonectria[J]. Phytopathology, 1966, 56(11):1361-1364.
[31] 张成玲, 张田田, 吴翠霞, 等. 花生果腐病病菌鉴定及生物学特性[J]. 花生学报, 2016, 45(3):27-31.
[32] 李术臣, 贾海民, 赵聚莹, 等. 河北省花生果腐病病原鉴定及致病性研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 2010, 15(5):37-39.
[33] 刘小玉, 付登强, 余凤玉, 等. 海南花生果腐病菌的分离、鉴定及生物学特性研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(6):104-107.
[34] 邢晓丽, 王磊, 王文斌. 中牟县花生果腐病病原菌种类鉴定及药剂防治试验[J]. 基层农计推广, 2019, 7(1):28-30.
[35] Ruiz-García C, Bejar V, Martinez-Checa F, et al. Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the River Vélez in Málaga, Southern Spain[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2005, 55(1):191-195.
[36] 张琼, Zabihullah S, 唐灿明. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌SZAD1对大丽轮枝菌的生物防治效果[J], 棉花学报, 2020, 32(4):329-338.
[37] 谢林艳, 狄义宁, 何丽莲, 等. 甘蔗赤腐病内生拮抗菌YC89的筛选及鉴定[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(4):739-748.
[38] 孙旺旺, 闫丽, 陈昌龙, 等. 生菜软腐和菌核病拮抗菌贝莱斯芽胞杆菌BPC6鉴定与防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):231-240.
[39] 李苗苗, 张家韬, 崔传斌, 等. 三株芽孢杆菌的生防特性研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(4):80-89.
[40] 曹禺. 芽孢杆菌Y6和F7防治番茄青枯病和香蕉枯萎病的研究[D]. 广州:华南农业大学, 2018.
[41] 王若琳, 徐伟芳, 王飞, 等. 桑树内生拮抗菌的分离鉴定及其对桑断枝烂叶病的生防初探[J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(11):2130-2143.
[42] 高艳侠, 张德锋, 可小丽, 等. 罗非鱼源无乳链球菌肠道拮抗芽孢杆菌的筛选及其生物学特性[J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(5):926-938.
[43] 马佳, 李颖, 胡栋, 等. 芽胞杆菌生物防治作用机理与应用研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(4):639-648.
[44] Gao Z F, Zhang B J, Liu H P, et al. Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinereal[J]. Biological Control, 2017, 105(1):27-39.
[45] 陈泽斌, 靳松, 张永福, 等. 植物内生菌生物防治研究进展及存在的问题[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2014, 36(3):40-42, 47.