生防菌D25与嘧环·咯菌腈复配对番茄灰霉病防治的增效作用

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2022.04.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了筛选获得生防菌D25与杀菌剂的复配制剂,降低杀菌剂用量并提高番茄灰霉病的防治效果,本文采用含毒介质法测定了12种杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病菌的室内毒力,并用平板计数法测定抑菌作用较好的杀菌剂与生防菌D25的生物相容性,采用毒性比率筛选出杀菌剂与生防菌D25复配的最佳比例,并通过盆栽试验进一步验证生防菌D25与杀菌剂复配对番茄灰霉病的防效。结果表明,12种杀菌剂中,枯草芽胞杆菌和哈茨木霉对番茄灰霉病菌的毒力最高,EC₅₀值分别为4.564×10^-5和0.021 mg/L。嘧环·咯菌腈对番茄灰霉病菌的毒力较强,EC₅₀值达0.043 mg/L。植物源杀菌剂香芹酚和苦参·蛇床素对番茄灰霉病菌的毒力最低,EC₅₀值分别为12.469和19.220 mg/L。生物相容性试验结果表明,嘧环·咯菌腈与生防菌D25有较好的生物相容性。0.043 mg/L嘧环·咯菌腈与7×10⁴ CFU/mL的生防菌D25以5:5体积比进行复配时,毒性比率可达1.3943,表现为增效作用。盆栽试验中预防处理组的防效达72.29%,比两种单剂的防效分别提高了19.26%和29.29%,治疗处理组的防效达61.57%,相比两种单剂的防效分别提高了15.40%和21.23%。综上所述,生防菌D25与嘧环·咯菌腈复配对番茄灰霉病菌具有增效作用,在不降低防病效果的情况下,可减少嘧环·咯菌腈的施药量达50%,具有很大应用潜力。

关键词: 生防菌, 番茄灰霉病菌, 联合毒力, 增效作用

Abstract: In order to screen the fungicide complex composed of biocontrol bacterium D25 and chemical fungicide to improve the biocontrol efficacy on tomato gray mold as well as reducing the dosage of chemical fungicides,toxicity of 12 fungicides against Botrytis cinerea was firstly tested in vitro by toxic medium method Bio-compatibility between fungicides with strong antifungal activity and biocontrol bacterium D25 was determined by plate counting method.O ptimal ratio of fungicides and biocontrol bacteriun D25 was screened by the toxicity ratio,and control efficacy of the complex in suppressing tomato gray mold was further tested in pot experiment.The results showed that among 12 fungicides,Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum had the strongest toxicity against B.cinerea,with EC₅₀ values of 4.564×10^-5 mg/L and 0.021 mg/L,respectively.Cyprodinil·fludioxonil had better toxicity,with EC₅₀ value of 0.043 mg/L.Two botanical fungicides,carvacrol and matrine·osthol,had the lowest toxicity,with EC₅₀ values of 12.469 mg/L and 19.220 mg/L,respectively.Biocompatibility test showed that no negative effect was found between cyprodinil·fludioxonil and bio-control bacterium D25.The complex of cyprodinil-fludioxonil (0.043 mg/L) and bio-control bacterium D25(7×10⁴CFU/mL) at a volume ratio of 5:5 performed synergistic effect,with the toxicity ratio of 1.3943.In the pot experiment,the control efficacy of the prevention group reached 72.29%,which was higher than that of the individual fungicide by 19.26% and 29.29%,respectively,while the control efficacy of the treatment group reached 61.57%,which was higher than that of the individual fungicide by 15.40% and 21.23%,respectively.In conclusion,combined application of bio-control bacterium D25 and cyprodinil·fludioxonil had a synergistic effect against B.cinerea,which reduced the application amount of cyprodinil·fludioxonil by 50% without reducing the control efficacy on tomato gray mold,and had great potential to be applied in field.

Key words: biocontrol bacterium, Botrytis cinerea, combined virulence, synergistic effect

中图分类号:

黄鑫, 郑丽宁, 顾学虎, 许煊炜, 张浩, 王迎春. 生防菌D25与嘧环·咯菌腈复配对番茄灰霉病防治的增效作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(4): 860-867.

HUANG Xin, ZHENG Lining, GU Xuehu, XU Xuanwei, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yingchun. Synergistic Effect of a Biocontrol Bacterium D25 and Cyprodinil·Fludioxonil on the Control of Tomato Gray Mold[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2022, 38(4): 860-867.

参考文献

[1] 杨燕涛.国内保护地蔬菜灰霉病侵染规律及防治技术研究进展[J].农药, 2003(1):6-10.
[2] Xu H, Sun L L, Wang Q, et al. Effects of different temperature and humidity on the growth of tomato gray mold mycelia[C]//Proceedings of the Third Conference on Horticulture Science and Technology, 2012, 426-430.
[3] Zhang Q X, Xing C L, Li S Y, et al. In vitro antagonism and biocontrol effects of Paenibacillus polymyxa JY1-5 against Botrytis cinerea in tomato[J]. Biological Control, 2021, 160:104689
[4] Cao S N, Yuan Y, Qin Y, et al. The pre-rRNA processing factor Nop53 regulates fungal development and pathogenesis via mediating production of reactive oxygen species[J]. Environmental microbiology, 2018, 20(4):1531-1549.
[5] Li Y G, Cai Y N, Liang Y B, et al. Assessment of antifungal activities of a biocontrol bacterium BA17 for managing postharvest gray mold of green bean caused by Botrytis cinerea[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 161:111086
[6] 纪明山,刘妍,朱赫,等.辽宁省番茄灰霉病菌对常用杀菌剂的抗药性监测与交互抗药性[J].农药, 2017, 56(9):676-678.
[7] 冯宝珍,李培谦.山西运城温室番茄灰葡萄孢对啶酰菌胺的抗性[J].西北农业学报, 2019, 28(8):1351-1357.
[8] 杜颖.辽宁省番茄灰霉病菌对腐霉利抗药性机制及快速检测技术研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[9] 李凤芳.番茄立枯病生防细菌的筛选及其防治效果[D].南宁:广西大学, 2020.
[10] 王永强.解淀粉芽胞杆菌SDTB009的分离鉴定及其对番茄枯萎病的防治研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学, 2020.
[11] 王兵.生防菌与杀菌剂联合应用对水稻主要病害病原菌的作用[D].大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2021.
[12] 陈美云.防控生姜茎基腐病的生防菌与杀菌剂协同施用研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学, 2019.
[13] 张萌,翟乾行,朱承余,等.荧光假单胞菌YG-1与杀菌剂复配对番茄灰霉病的联合毒力[J].中国蔬菜, 2021(5):70-74.
[14] Ji X X, Li J J, Meng Z, et al. Synergistic effect of combined application of a new fungicide fluopimomide with a biocontrol agent Bacillus methylotrophicus TA-1 for management of gray mold in tomato[J]. Plant Disease, 2019, 103(8):1991-1997.
[15] Zheng L N, Zhang J P, Wu X, et al. A novel biocontrol strain Pantoea jilinensis D25 for effective biocontrol of tomato gray mold (causative agent Botrytis cinerea)[J]. Biological Control, 2021, 164:104766.
[16] Li Y G, Xi Q X,Wen S Y. The research of inhibition mechanism and the application on Botrytis cinerea of 5% potash alum water solution[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 2220(647):548-553.
[17] 杨利敏.番茄灰霉生防菌的筛选、鉴定及生防机制研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学, 2015.
[18] 范文忠,杨静,郑玉石.不同复配杀菌剂对人参菌核病病菌的室内毒力及田间药效试验[J].农药, 2019, 58(4):296-299.
[19] 谭才邓,朱美娟,杜淑霞,等.抑菌试验中抑菌圈法的比较研究[J].食品工业, 2016, 37(11):122-125.
[20] Zhang G Z, Wang F T, Qin J C, et al. Efficacy assessment of antifungal metabolites from Chaetomium globosum No.05, a new biocontrol agent, against Setosphaeria turcica[J]. Biological Control, 2013, 64(1):90-98.
[21] 纪兆林,曹军,沈斐,等.地衣芽孢杆菌W10与咪鲜胺对桃枝枯病的协同防治作用[J].农药, 2019, 58(6):454-457.
[22] 陈长卿,金辉,姜云,等.生防菌株NJ13与化学农药复配对人参黑斑病的联合毒力及田间防效[J].农药, 2019, 58(5):381-384.
[23] 谷春艳,王学峰,苏贤岩,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌WH1G与氟啶胺协同防治草莓灰霉病[J].农药, 2017, 56(12):932-936.
[24] 杨鹏斌.绿色木霉菌发酵液对金黄色葡萄球菌抑制作用和机理的研究[D].广州:仲恺农业工程学院, 2013.
[25] 张兴,马志卿,冯俊涛,等.植物源农药研究进展[J].中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5):685-698.
[26] 李婷,周月,宋丽雅,等.植物抑菌剂抑菌机理的研究方法进展[J].北方园艺, 2016(4):179-184.
[27] Brent K J, Hollomon D W. Fungicide resistance:the assessment of risk[J]. FRAC Monograph, 2007, 2:1-48
[28] 杜颖,付丹妮,邹益泽,等. 2017年辽宁省番茄灰霉病菌对腐霉利的抗药性现状及机制研究[J].中国蔬菜, 2018(1):58-65.