Soil Restoration for Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Tomato Greenhouse Field and the Control Effect against Bacterial Wilt Disease

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2018.01.014

Abstract

Abstract: Soil restoration for continuous cropping obstacles has become a serious problem in the world. In this study, micro ecological preparation and plant vaccine agent (avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum) were combined to restore soil and prevent bacterial wilt disease. At 7 years continuous cropping tomato greenhouses field, two doses of micro ecological preparation (60 t/hm² and 30 t/hm²) combining with plant vaccine agent were designed, and the control did not contain any micro ecological preparation or plant vaccine. The effects of different treatments on the contents of soil nutrients, soil enzymes, biological characteristics of tomato plant and the control efficiency against bacterial wilt disease were compared. The results showed that the contents of organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphatase and exchangeable calcium for two doses of micro ecological preparation treatments were significantly higher than control treatment, while the content of total potassium was significantly lower. Moreover, the activities of soil urease, catalase, sucrose and acid phosphatase for two doses of micro ecological preparation treatments were also significantly higher than control treatment, and they were higher for the dose of 30 t/hm² than for the dose of 60 t/hm². The single fruit weight at the dose of 30 t/hm² was 113.82 g, significantly higher than that of 60 t/hm² dose (104.07 g) and control treatment (104.99 g) (P<0.05). Furthermore, the control efficiency of 30 t/hm² micro ecological preparation (reaching to 91.87%) was also higher than that of 60 t/hm².

Key words: continuous cropping obstacles, soil restoration, tomato bacterial wilt disease, comprehensive control measures

CLC Number:

S476

ZHENG Xuefang, LIU Bo, ZHU Yujing, CHEN Deju, CHEN Xiaoqiang, WEI Yuhuang. Soil Restoration for Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Tomato Greenhouse Field and the Control Effect against Bacterial Wilt Disease[J]. journal1, 2018, 34(1): 117-123.

References

[1] 葛晓颖, 孙志刚, 李涛, 等. 设施番茄连作障碍与土壤芽孢杆菌和假单胞菌及微生物群落的关系分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(2):514-523.
[2] Yadessa G B, Bruggen A, Ocho F L. Effects of different soil amendments on bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum and on the yield of tomato[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2010, 92:439-450.
[3] 王敬国, 陈清, 林杉. 设施菜田退化土壤修复与资源高效利用[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2011.
[4] Tan Y, Cui Y, Li H, et al. Rhizospheric soil and root endogenous fungal diversity and composition in response to continuous panax notoginseng cropping practices[J]. Microbiology Research, 2017, 194:10-19.
[5] Xiong W, Zhao Q Y, Zhao J. Different continuous cropping spans significantly affect microbial community membership and structure in a vanilla-grown soil as revealed by deep pyrosequencing[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2015, 70(1):209-218.
[6] Cheng F, Cheng Z H, Meng H W. Transcriptomic insights into the allelopathic effects of the garlic allelochemical diallyl disulfide on tomato roots[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:38902.
[7] Ding H, Cheng Z, Liu M, et al. Garlic exerts allelopathic effects on pepper physiology in a hydroponic co-culture system[J]. Biology Open, 2016, 5:1-7
[8] Renaud M,Chelinho S, Alvarenga P, et al. Organic wastes as soil amendments-effects assessment towards soil invertebrates[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 330:149-156.
[9] 高亚娟. 草莓连作障碍土壤改良技术研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2013.
[10] 李保会. 复合微生物菌肥对连作草莓矿质养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2007, 30(3):44-47.
[11] 张艳杰, 杨淑, 陈英化, 等. 玫瑰黄链霉菌防治番茄连作障碍及对土壤微生物区系的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(8):122-127.
[12] 殷振江, 周勇, 张宇, 等. 浅析温室番茄连作障碍防控技术[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2015, 61(7):109-111.
[13] 郑雪芳, 朱育菁, 刘波, 等. 番茄青枯病植物疫苗胶悬剂的制德及其对病害的防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2):208-211.
[14] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1986.
[15] Murphy C E, Lemerle D. Continuous cropping systems and weed selection[J]. Euphtica, 2006, 148(1):61-73.
[16] 刘润进, 陈应龙. 菌根学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2007.
[17] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008-1010.
[18] 李鹏. 植物基质对土壤生态改良的效果研究[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2015, 31(12):20-21.
[19] 朱虹, 王文杰, 祖元刚, 等.树皮土基质和降盐碱剂对盐碱土的改良效应[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(7):42-48.
[20] 刘素慧, 刘世琦, 张自坤, 等. 大蒜连作对其根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(5):1000-1006.
[21] Yao X H, Min H, Lu Z H, et al. Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, 42(2):120-126.
[22] Lagomarsin A, Benedetti A, Marinari S, et al. Soil organic C variability and microbial functions in a Mediterranean agro-forest ecosystem[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soil, 2011, 47(3):283-291.
[23] Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, et al. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 75(1):43-48.
[24] 郭永盛, 李鲁华, 危常州, 等. 施氮肥对新疆荒漠草原生物量和土壤酶海活性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(S1):249-256.
[25] Kábana R R, Truelove B. Effects of crop rotation and fertilization on catalase activity in a soil of the southeastern United States[J]. Plant and Soil, 1982, 69(1):97-104.
[26] Gu Y, Wang P, Kong C. Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2009, 45(5/6):436-441.
[27] Antonious G F. Impact of soil management and two botanical insecticides on urease and invertase acitivity[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B:Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 2003, 38(4):479-488.
[28] 孙彩霞, 陈利军, 武志杰. Bt杀虫晶体蛋白的土壤残留及其对土壤磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(5):761-765.
[29] 张晓鹏, 刘雅亭. 土壤处理剂对黄瓜连作土壤中土壤酶活性及黄瓜品质影响的试验[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2015, 10:4-6.
[30] 万年鑫, 郑顺林, 周少猛, 等. 薯玉轮作对马铃薯根区土壤养分及酶活效应分析[J]. 浙江大学学报, 2016, 42(1):74-80.
[31] Anna P D, Przemyslaw C. The impact of the soil sealing degree on microbial biomass, enzymatic activity and physicochemical properties in the Ekranic Technosols of Torun[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(1):47-59.
[32] Li L, Feng X, Tang M, et al. Antibacterial activity of Lansiumamide B to tobacco bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)[J]. Microbiology Research, 2014, 169(8):522-526.
[33] 伍朝荣, 黄飞, 高阳, 等. 土壤生物消毒对土壤改良、青枯菌抑菌及番茄生长的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(8):1173-1180.
[34] 张震, 张炳欣, 喻景权. 黄瓜土传病害拮抗菌分离鉴定及生物活性测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2004, 16(3):151-155.
[35] Raza W, Ling N, Liu D, et al. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WR-1 restrict the growth and virulence traits of Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. Microbiological Research, 2016, 192:103-113.
[36] Zhou T, Chen D, Li C, et al. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas brassicacearum J12 as an antagonist against Ralstonia solanacearum and identification of its antimicrobial components[J]. Microbiology Research, 2012, 167(7):384-394.