Effects of Wheat-pea Intercropping with Volatile Release Combined with Different Device Application on Wheat Pests and Natural Enemies in Wheat Field

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.09.012

Abstract

Abstract: The push-pull technology of pest control through intercropping with volatile release can increase the biodiversity in the field and the control efficiency of natural enemies, and reduce the use of pesticides. However, there are few studies on the effects of different spray equipments on pests and natural enemies under different control measures. In this study, insecticides were applied by self-propelled sprayer and manual knapsack sprayer for insect pest control in the four treatments, mono-cropping field, wheat-pea intercropping field, wheat-pea intercropping with aphid alarm pheromone (E-β-farnesene (EBF)) release field, and wheat-pea with MeSA release field. The results showed that the spraying speed of the self-propelled sprayer was much faster than that of the manual knapsack sprayer. The number of wheat grains per spike and yield per hectare were significantly affected by spraying device. The thousand grain weight and yield per ha of the intercropping with methyl salicylate (MeSA) release treatment with self-propelled sprayer were significantly higher than those in all the other treatments. Sprayer had little effect on the average numbers of Sitobion miscanthi and ladybird in the mono-cropping field. However, the numbers of Rhopalosiphum padi, mites and mummies in the self-propelled sprayer treatments were lower than those in the manual knapsack sprayer treatments. The average numbers of S. miscanthi, R. padi and mites in intercropping with volatile release treatment were significantly lower than those in the other treatments when the self-propelled sprayer was applied except that the number of ladybird was to the contrary. Intercropping with MeSA significantly increased the number of mummies in wheat compared with mono-cropping, regardless of spraying method. The density of mites was lower in mono-culture and intercropping with MeSA treatments before spraying. The density of mites remained low in the intercropping with MeSA treatment after spraying. The number of mites in intercropping with MeSA or EBF release treatments dropped to a trough in the second survey after spraying. In contrast, in the monoculture treatment, the number of mites picked up significantly. In conclusion, wheat-pea intercropping with MeSA release treatment significantly increases wheat yield and provides the best control of wheat aphids and mites and the best protection of natural enemies. Self-propelled sprayer has obvious advantages over knapsack sprayer in pesticide spraying efficiency, pest control efficacy and increase of wheat yield, but may have a stronger non-target effect on natural enemies than manual knapsack sprayer.

Key words: spray equipment, intercropping, volatilen release, Sitobion miscanthi, Rhopalosiphum padi, mite, natural enemy

CLC Number:

S476

TAN Xiaoling, YAN Jia, MIAO Jin, SUN Jingxuan, CHEN Julian. Effects of Wheat-pea Intercropping with Volatile Release Combined with Different Device Application on Wheat Pests and Natural Enemies in Wheat Field[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2021, 37(5): 904-913.

References

[1] 闫甲, 王怡, 李迁, 等. 土壤施硅对小麦和麦蚜的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(6):1228-1233.
[2] Lopes T, Hatt S, Xu Q, et al. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-based intercropping systems for biological pest control[J]. Pest Management Science, 2016, 72:2193-2202.
[3] Douglas J, Umina P, Macfadyen S, et al. Field associations of first generation densities of the pest mites halotydeus destructor and penthaleus major in pasture[J]. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 2018, 76:487-506.
[4] Han Z L, Tan X L, Wang Y, et al. Effects of simulated climate warming on the population dynamics of Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) and its parasitoids in wheat fields[J]. Pest Management Science, 2019, 75(12):3252-3259.
[5] 李耀明, 唐会联, 杨丽, 等. 新型药械性能测定及其应用于稻飞虱防治的效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2015, 35(1):60-63.
[6] 王明, 王希, 何玲, 等. 植保无人飞机低空低容量喷雾在茶园的雾滴沉积分布及对茶小绿叶蝉的防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(1):62-68, 87.
[7] 陈盛德, 兰玉彬, 李继宇, 等. 航空喷施与人工喷施方式对水稻施药效果比较[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(4):103-109.
[8] 焦雨轩, 薛新宇, 丁素明, 等. 不同植保机械施药对棉蚜防效的影响[J]. 农机化研究, 2022, 44(3):159-170.
[9] Ju Q, Ouyang F, Gu S, et al. Strip intercropping peanut with maize for peanut aphid biological control and yield enhancement[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 286:106682.
[10] Bedoussac L, Journet E P, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, et al. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35:911-935.
[11] Costanzo A, Bàrberi P. Functional agrobiodiversity and agroecosystem services in sustainable wheat production[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014, 34:327-348.
[12] Mansion-Vaquié A, Ferrer A, Ramon-Portugal F, et al. Intercropping impacts the host location behaviour and population growth of aphids[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2020, 168(1):41-52.
[13] Diehl E, Sereda E, Wolters V, et al. Effects of predator specialization, host plant and climate on biological control of aphids by natural enemies:a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 50:262-270.
[14] Ben-Issa R, Gomez L, Gautier H. Companion plants for aphid pest management[J]. Insects, 2017, 8:1-19.
[15] 门兴元, 董兆克, 李丽莉, 等. 基于生态调控的小麦害虫综合治理研究进展[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(1):59-69.
[16] Xu Q X, Hatt S, Lopes T, et al. A push-pull strategy to control aphids combine sintercropping with semiochemical releases[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2018, 91(1):93-103.
[17] James, D G. Field evaluation of herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects:methyl salicylate and the green lacewing, Chrysopa nigricornis[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(7):1601-1609.
[18] Zhu J W, Park K C. Methyl salicylate, a soybean aphid-induced plant volatile attractive to the predator Coccinella septempunctata[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31:1733-1746.
[19] Lee J C. Effect of methyl salicylate-based lures on beneficial and pest arthropods in strawberry[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2010, 39(2):653-660.
[20] 周海波, 刘玉军, 陈龙胜. 田间释放E-β-法尼烯对黄山贡菊蚜虫的生态调控作用[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(3):101-104.
[21] 王佐乾, 吴婧莲, 吴涛, 等. 不同植保机械在湖北稻田病虫害防治中的效能评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(2):89-95.
[22] 董雨轩, 张晶晶. 不同施药器械雾滴密度的测量及其影响因素分析[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(20):152-153.
[23] 徐华强, 刘艳艳, 祝国栋, 等. 16种不同类型农药对两种寄生蜂的毒性比较和安全性评价[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(6):959-964.
[24] 吴红波, 张帆, 王素琴, 等. 几种常用的杀虫剂对异色瓢虫的敏感性测定[J]. 中国生物防治, 2007, 23(3):213-217.
[25] 李海强, 张建萍, 陆宴辉. 果棉间作对棉田节肢动物群落结构的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(2):233-238.
[26] 解海翠, 陈巨莲, 程登发, 等. 麦田间作对麦长管蚜的生态调控作用[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 38(1):50-54.
[27] 杨泉峰, 欧阳芳, 门兴元, 等. 北方富含天敌的功能植物的发现与应用[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2018, 55(5):942-947.
[28] 董洁, 刘英杰, 王光, 等. 间作与施用水杨酸甲酯对麦长管蚜及其主要天敌空间分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 23(7):1940-1944.
[29] Aartsma Y, Bianchi F, Werf W, et al. Herbivore-induced plant volatiles and tritrophic interactions across spatial scales[J]. New Phytologist, 2017, 216(4):1054-1063.
[30] James D G, Price T S. Field-testing of methyl salicylate for recruitment and retention of beneficial insects in grapes and hops[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2004, 30(8):1613-1628.
[31] Halitschke R, Stenberg J A, Kessler D, et al. Shared signals-‘alarmcalls’ from plants increase apparency to herbivores and their enemies in nature[J]. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11:24-34.
[32] Mérey G E V, Veyrat N, Lange E D, et al. Minor effects of two elicitors of insect and pathogen resistance on volatile emissions and parasitism of Spodoptera frugiperda in Mexican maize fields[J]. Biological Control, 2012, 60(1):7-15.