Influence of Three Insecticides (Acaricides) on Predation Function of Neoseiulus bicaudus

doi:10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.01.018

Abstract

Abstract: The safety of insecticides (acaricides) to Neoseiulus bicaudus was evaluated throug measuring the toxicity of cyflumetofen, chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam to N. bicaudus and T. turkestani by spraying method. The influence of three insecticides (acaricides) and different application methods on the predation of N. bicaudus were determined. The results showed that the toxicity of cyflumetofen on N. bicaudus was significantly lower than that on T. turkestani, the corrected mortality rate of N. bicaudus was below 15% even at the concentration of 1000 mg/L, whereas the LC₅₀ for T. turkestani was 65.08 mg/L. Toxicity of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam on both N. bicaudus and T. turkestani was low, and the corrected mortality rate was below 20%. When treated with the three pesticides, the predatory mites showed decreased attack rate, predation ability, maximum consumption rate and searching efficiency and elongated handling time. The strength of the influence of the three agents ranked as:thiamethoxam > chlorantraniliprole > cyflumetofen. Amont the multiple treatments, only spraying cyflumetofen before releasing the predatory mite showed no significant influence on the predation function of N. bicaudus. With each insecticide, spraying before releasing predatory mites resulted in a less significantly influence than that of spraying after releasing predatory mites. Cyflumetofen showed only limited negative influence on the survival and predation of N. bicaudus. When field pest mites outbreak, cyflumetofen can be sprayed to reduce the pest population and then N. bicaudus can be released to achieve a combined control of the pests, thus reducing the dose and frequency of pesticide sprays. When chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam are used for control of other pests, it is better that they are used before releasing N. bicaudus, thus reducing their negative influence on N. bicaudus.

Key words: predatory mites, cyflumetofen, chlorantraniliprole, thiamethoxam, predation ability, biological control

CLC Number:

S476.2

FU Zhenshi, TANG Siqiong, SU Jie, CHEN Jing, ZHANG Jianping. Influence of Three Insecticides (Acaricides) on Predation Function of Neoseiulus bicaudus[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2022, 38(1): 42-49.

References

[1] 洪晓月, 薛晓峰, 王进军, 等. 作物重要叶螨综合防控技术研究与示范推广[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2013, 50(2):321-328.
[2] Guo Y L, Jiao X D, Xu J J, et al. Growth and reproduction of Tetranychus turkestani (Ugarov et Nikolskii) and Tetranychus truncatus (Ehara) (Acari:Tetranychidae) on cotton and corn[J]. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 2013, 18(1):89-98.
[3] Li G Y, Li J J, Xia W, et al. Effect of Bt+CpTI transgenic cotton on the performance of Tetranychus turkestani(Acari:Tetranychidae)[J]. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 2014, 19(2):236-240.
[4] 徐学农, 吕佳乐, 王恩东. 捕食螨在中国的研究与应用[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2013, 33(10):26-34.
[5] 徐学农, 吕佳乐, 王恩东. 捕食螨繁育与应用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5):647-656.
[6] Wang B M, Wang Z H, Jiang X H, et al. Re-description of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari:Phytoseiidae) newly recorded from Xinjiang, China[J]. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 2015, 20(4):455-461.
[7] 王振辉, 李永涛, 李婷, 等. 双尾新小绥螨的形态特征及捕食性功能[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2015, 52(3):580-586.
[8] Zhang Y N, Jiang J Y Q, Zhang Y J, et al. Functional response and prey preference of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Mesostigmata:phytoseiidae) to three important pests in Xinjiang, China[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2017, 46:538-543.
[9] Su J, Dong F, Liu S M, et al. Productivity of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari:Phytoseiidae) reared on natural prey, alternative prey, and artificial diet[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019, 112(6):2604-2613.
[10] 韩国栋, 唐思琼, 苏杰, 等. 双尾新小绥螨对烟粉虱和土耳其斯坦叶螨的捕食选择性[J].中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(3):347-352.
[11] 董芳, 符振实, 王嘉阳, 等. 双尾新小绥螨对土耳其斯坦叶螨控制效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1):1-12.
[12] 符振实, 苏杰, 董芳, 等. 双尾新小绥螨防治菜豆土耳其斯坦叶螨的释放技术研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(4):750-759.
[13] 黄建华, 陈洪凡, 王丽思, 等. 应用捕食螨防治蓟马研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2016, 32(1):119-124.
[14] 符振实, 白洪瑞, 唐思琼, 等. 3种杀螨剂与双尾新小绥螨联合防治棉叶螨[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020(6):1127-1135
[15] 肖顺根, 余丽萍, 舒畅, 等. 橘园常用杀螨剂对巴氏钝绥螨和柑橘全爪螨的选择毒性[J].植物保护, 2010, 36(3):155-157
[16] 侯栋元, 丛林, 陈飞, 等. 巴氏新小绥螨甲氰菊酯抗性品系生物学特性及其对常用药剂的交互抗性[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(3):690-699.
[17] 刘慧娟, 徐学农, 缪勇, 等. 阿维菌素防治西花蓟马的亚致死浓度对黄瓜钝绥螨的影响[J]. 中国生物防治, 2007, 23(2):198-200.
[18] de Sousa Neto E P, Mendes J de A, Filgueiras R M C, et al. Effects of acaricides on the functional and numerical responses of the Phytoseid predator Neoseiulus idaeus (Acari:Phytoseiidae) to spider mite Eggs[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2020, 113(4):1804-1809.
[19] 杨国璋. 杀虫杀螨剂-丁氟螨酯[J]. 世界农药, 2013, 35(6):59-60.
[20] 王勇庆, 马千里, 谭煜婷, 等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺对草地贪夜蛾的毒力及田间防效[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(4):782-788.
[21] 万岩然, 苑广迪, 何秉青, 等. 噻虫嗪灌根对四种叶菜上害虫的防治效果及残留检测[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(4):945-949.
[22] Shen X Q, Zhang Y N, Li T, et al. Toxicity of three acaricides to the predatory Mite, Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari:Phytoseiidae) and their impact on the functional response to Tetranychus turkestani (Acari:Tetranychidae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2017, 110(5):2031-2038
[23] 乔岩, 张涛, 庞博, 等. 联合应用智利小植绥螨与丁氟螨酯防治草莓二斑叶螨[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(4):514-519.
[24] 蒋春先, 田亚静, 李庆, 等. 杀螨剂对朱砂叶螨的毒力测定和对加州新小绥螨的安全性评价[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(4):551-557.
[25] 周娴, 邱晔, 李兴龙, 等. 噻虫嗪与氯虫苯甲酰胺对非靶标害虫土耳其斯坦叶螨生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1):23-31.
[26] 马方芳. SYP-9080对柑橘始叶螨及胡瓜新小绥螨亚致死效应研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2014.
[27] 田亚静. 乙唑螨腈和丁氟螨酯对朱砂叶螨及加州新小绥螨的亚致死效应研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2017.
[28] 范潇. 联苯肼酯和乙螨唑对二斑叶螨及巴氏新小绥螨亚致死效应研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2015.
[29] 汝阳. 阿维菌素和哒螨灵对巴氏新小绥螨的亚致死效应研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2016.